Why is Deathly Hallows movie split in two parts and not Order of the Pheonix , OotP is a longer boo

bull96 · March 2009

Isn't Order of the Pheonix longer than Deatly Hallows?

Wilbo421 · March 2009

Yes. But OotP is filled with a LOT of unimportant things that could easily be cut out. DH, on the other hand, as virtually nothing that is unimportant, so very little can be cut out.

bull96 · March 2009

ahhh thanks

Richard · March 2009

They should have made parts4,5,and6into 2 films each

Wilbo421 · March 2009

No they bloody well should not have.

Harry James Potter · March 2009

I think only Goblet of Fire and Deathly Hallows should be two films. Six can easily be one film and five too. Four had so much important things taken out.

Wilbo421 · March 2009

Completely disagree. GoF turned out fine. Nothing left out has or will effect the series.

Joanna_photographer · March 2009

I thought hp4 was done well nothing important was left out in 5 stuff was but noting that really mattered hallows is all important every word so i'm glad its going to be two movies! Just offering my opinion not trying to make people mad

Wilbo421 · March 2009

And I agree

silentscream · June 2009

i disagree all the movies have stuff left out..except 1-3 they may not seem impotant but they show up later in the series like alot has underlying hints!

HermioneAnnGranger · July 2009

Correction, technically one did have stuff left out, like the troll and potion protection for the Philosopher's stone.

I think most of the movies were great and well done. Except the Order of the Phoenix which was a bit of a shambles, no offense to anyone. And even though, as said above, in the Goblet of Fire the bits taken out/changed won't and don't affect the series in anyway, it sort of made the Goblet of Fire a bit less special, even though it is my second favourite.

Just my opinion anyway.

Why is Deathly Hallows movie split in two parts and not Order of the Pheonix , OotP is a longer boo

Comments