DH will supposedly have a sufficient explanation of Horcruxes. Cuaron was a great filmmaker but preferred style over substance, which wouldn't have worked for two reasons:
1. The book MUST include more substance than style, for the huge amount of info it possessses. 2. The style Cuaron worked with would have ONLY suited POA movie and not DH at all.
Yates is great at balancing style with substance, which is why he's the best for the job.
[quote=richard]Horcruxes most important and yates hasnt explained those their just their... [/quote] I have hope that it'll all be explained proper in DH. I wish it had been done in HBP, but it'll be interesting to see how they do it in DH.
[quote=muggle]I have hope that it'll all be explained proper in DH. I wish it had been done in HBP, but it'll be interesting to see how they do it in DH. [/quote] However, this does provide a pleasantly unexpected cliffhanger which will tie in non-readers to watch DH.
Considering it's wrapping up the entire series, I think they'll tie up all of the loose ends. They also have had plenty of more time to work with, so I'd say it'll be fine. We just have to trust them!
[quote=aaron]However, this does provide a pleasantly unexpected cliffhanger which will tie in non-readers to watch DH. [/quote] That's a good point Aaron.
WILL WE EVER FIND OUT IN THE FILM VERSION WHERE THE MIRRIOR COMES FROM? TEST SCREENERS HAVE ALL SAID IT JUST SHOWS UP AND IS NEVER EXPLAINED!!! THIS REALLY BUGS ME
Oh and BTW, today, this girl said she went to go see the owl movie, and I knew she hated Harry Potter, but I was just curious to know if she saw the trailer. To my suprise when I asked her if she saw the trailer, she actually said "That actually looks good! And I hate Harry Potter!" She did say it looked a bit scary though. xD
No idea if she's gonna see it or not, that's all I had time to talk to her about. :P But it's further proof that these films are getting non-fan interest.
I actually refuse to believe that there isn't something more to this whole "mirror scandal". They've gotta have an explanation somewhere whether it's in Part I, II, or they'll go back and edit it so it makes more sense.
Comments
1. The book MUST include more substance than style, for the huge amount of info it possessses.
2. The style Cuaron worked with would have ONLY suited POA movie and not DH at all.
Yates is great at balancing style with substance, which is why he's the best for the job.
I have hope that it'll all be explained proper in DH. I wish it had been done in HBP, but it'll be interesting to see how they do it in DH.
However, this does provide a pleasantly unexpected cliffhanger which will tie in non-readers to watch DH.
That's a good point Aaron.
&Nick, perhaps it's a subtle thing? Like they show, rather than tell, over the span of the movie.
Thats cool!!!!! Im seeing owls soon i just saw the town one of my fave movies
WIN haha
I actually refuse to believe that there isn't something more to this whole "mirror scandal". They've gotta have an explanation somewhere whether it's in Part I, II, or they'll go back and edit it so it makes more sense.
thats it!
he finds it in ginny's G spot!
sarah u will love it!