Sill waiting for the girl with the dragon tattoo sequel....
Tell me dear, was the film any good?
I've only ever seen the Swedish ones so is the American one exceptional? I've only seen bits and pieces of it on HBO and the opening. Is the entire film worth a watch?
Sill waiting for the girl with the dragon tattoo sequel....
Tell me dear, was the film any good?
I've only ever seen the Swedish ones so is the American one exceptional? I've only seen bits and pieces of it on HBO and the opening. Is the entire film worth a watch?
Definitely.
First of all, it's Fincher, the master of gritty settings. He gives Dragon Tattoo a darker edge, and an unsettling feeling (punctuated even more by Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross soundtrack) that stays, and helps through the tension on key scenes, even better than the Swedish original.
But not only that, it sticks more to the novel (mainly in the presence of Erika Berger and the whole subplot involving the lawsuit against Mikael), has almost one hour more than the first adaptation.
Finally, in what I would call a very personal opinion, I liked Rooney Mara's Lisbeth Salander more. Not that Noomi Rapace wasn't good, she was great, but Mara had this fragility which kinda added to the character (and I heard it was more in touch with the novel), without losing her fierceness. Daniel Craig and Mikael Nyqvist were kinda toe-to-toe. But for the rest of the cast, I preferred Fincher's version, maybe because the recognizable faces did help, or in a way, this helped them get more screentime, while in the Swedish, most of the supporting cast felt more like passer-byes.
But hey, that's just me. But I recommend.
Quaalude fight: because drunk fight is too mainstream.
Sill waiting for the girl with the dragon tattoo sequel....
Tell me dear, was the film any good?
I've only ever seen the Swedish ones so is the American one exceptional? I've only seen bits and pieces of it on HBO and the opening. Is the entire film worth a watch?
Definitely.
First of all, it's Fincher, the master of gritty settings. He gives Dragon Tattoo a darker edge, and an unsettling feeling (punctuated even more by Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross soundtrack) that stays, and helps through the tension on key scenes, even better than the Swedish original.
But not only that, it sticks more to the novel (mainly in the presence of Erika Berger and the whole subplot involving the lawsuit against Mikael), has almost one hour more than the first adaptation.
Finally, in what I would call a very personal opinion, I liked Rooney Mara's Lisbeth Salander more. Not that Noomi Rapace wasn't good, she was great, but Mara had this fragility which kinda added to the character (and I heard it was more in touch with the novel), without losing her fierceness. Daniel Craig and Mikael Nyqvist were kinda toe-to-toe. But for the rest of the cast, I preferred Fincher's version, maybe because the recognizable faces did help, or in a way, this helped them get more screentime, while in the Swedish, most of the supporting cast felt more like passer-byes.
But hey, that's just me. But I recommend.
Wow, thank you for that. I'll give the film a try then.
And don't worry about it. Your input is very much appreciated.
Paul McGuigan's Frankenstein has been moved from October 17th, 2014 to January 16th, 2015. The film stars James McAvoy as Victor Von Frankenstein and Daniel Radcliffe as Igor.
new movie with Liam Neeson the plot of this movie is absolutely ludicris I definitely will pass on this.
Indeed, it looks very standard, but because of the cast, I'm willing to give it the benefit of doubt. Julianne Moore, Michelle Dockery and Scoot McNairy are solid players.
Quaalude fight: because drunk fight is too mainstream.
Comments
Lord Stafford.
Something tells me that, with this cast, Grand Budapest Hotel might be his masterpiece.
Quaalude fight: because drunk fight is too mainstream.
Lord Stafford.
I've only ever seen the Swedish ones so is the American one exceptional? I've only seen bits and pieces of it on HBO and the opening. Is the entire film worth a watch?
First of all, it's Fincher, the master of gritty settings. He gives Dragon Tattoo a darker edge, and an unsettling feeling (punctuated even more by Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross soundtrack) that stays, and helps through the tension on key scenes, even better than the Swedish original.
But not only that, it sticks more to the novel (mainly in the presence of Erika Berger and the whole subplot involving the lawsuit against Mikael), has almost one hour more than the first adaptation.
Finally, in what I would call a very personal opinion, I liked Rooney Mara's Lisbeth Salander more. Not that Noomi Rapace wasn't good, she was great, but Mara had this fragility which kinda added to the character (and I heard it was more in touch with the novel), without losing her fierceness. Daniel Craig and Mikael Nyqvist were kinda toe-to-toe. But for the rest of the cast, I preferred Fincher's version, maybe because the recognizable faces did help, or in a way, this helped them get more screentime, while in the Swedish, most of the supporting cast felt more like passer-byes.
But hey, that's just me. But I recommend.
Quaalude fight: because drunk fight is too mainstream.
Quaalude fight: because drunk fight is too mainstream.
And don't worry about it. Your input is very much appreciated.
Lord Stafford.
Quaalude fight: because drunk fight is too mainstream.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Fg5iWmQjwk
Lord Stafford.
Lord Stafford.
It looks like it has a lot of potential to be a really fantastic film.
Lord Stafford.
Lord Stafford.
Lord Stafford.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hEnLF-pCybwLord Stafford.
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/constantin-restart-production-mortal-instruments-650328
Woohoo!!
Lord Stafford.
Quaalude fight: because drunk fight is too mainstream.
Lord Stafford.