Welcome to Harry Potter Forum! Below you will find many interesting threads and discussions. Enjoy.
Should we be worried about Twilight's Breaking Dawn?
I asked myself this question when I saw that the Twilight "trio" had their hand,foot ceremony in Hollywood. I MEAN, why do they have to do exactly the same thing, like why the three of them, what a lame copy of what Dan,Rupert and Emma did! On the one hand i'm kinda scared because i fear that Breaking Dawn pt 1 and 2 will gross more than DH pt 1 and 2, probably becoming more grossing than DHPT2. But on the other hand i'm not THAT worried because none of the Twilight movies have been more grossing than ANY of the Potter films, and I don't think they will out of nowhere beat Potter. What are your thoughts? Will Twilight beat Harry Potter in cinemas?



Comments
Mysterious thing time.
Also, using box office earnings to defend something, in general, is a surefire way to reinforce the fact that you're a fucking idiot. Using cash earnings as a serious defense to extrapolate the quality of story, character, atmosphere, filmmaking, and every other aspect of a work of art is inconceivably ignorant to the point where anyone who actually tries to do so is signing a contract under the dotted line in fine print that states that they have forfeit their right to free speech.
Mysterious thing time.
It's just like Rotten Tomatoes reviews. When something gets a higher percentage than something else, fans of that something else are going to say "well they're just critic reviews and they're always wrong anyway." Whereas if their favored film gets the higher score, all of a sudden, guess what? The RT score is now relevant!
This is why reviews, box office, whatever is a sting to debate: it doesn't LEAD to legitimate debate. It doesn't spell out what's better than something else. As far as I'm concerned, despite Twilight being an incredibly, incredibly awful series, someone could LITERALLY make a more valid debate in a Twilight vs. whatever topic by debating using the actual source material than by playing the box office numbers card. Because the box office numbers card only dictates how many tickets are sold, rather than the actual quality of the product. It's inarguable.
I would rather a Twilight fan try to pull valid reasoning out of those horrendous books because they'd have a much better, if fleeting, shot than if they try to defend it by using how many tickets it sold.
Is Breaking Dawn's box office earnings going to retroactively erase Harry Potter's triumphs from history?
No matter how many objections I might have about DH2, it was good, not some shitty teenage fling movie. Not only that, but HP fans are more numerous, I think. We're from all the age groups, from 10 year olds to 50 year olds... Whereas Twilight fans are mostly 12-16.
And yeah, even if it did make more than DH, it wouldn't really mean anything. We know it's better and we truly appreciate all it's done for us. That's what matters. The box office... just a number on a list.
vs.
vs.
Hmm...
Mysterious thing time.
Mysterious thing time.