Welcome to Harry Potter Forum! Below you will find many interesting threads and discussions. Enjoy.
Am I the only one slightly worried about BOH?
Don't get me wrong, the way it looks in the trailers is amazing and epic, and the build up clips like McGonagall with the knights and the shield going up look amazing, it looks like it will be an epic build up...but from the clips we've seen, I feel a little thrown and almost a little disappointed. It's not that it doesn't have music (though the bit with Flitwick panting does sound unintentionally hilarious and I hope that's not like that in the movie). It's just that it all seems so disjointed. It could always just be the way it's edited in the clips, but it really seems rushed.
Also, the way it's shot isn't particularly good. The framing of the fighting is odd and not particularly exciting. Again, I can only go on what I've seen, but I expected it to be all intense with hundreds of people fighting and all these spells exploding, but that's not how it is. For one, they use the same effect for EVERY SPELL. I mean, ok they did that a bit in the other movies, but this is a proper battle, they should look different and have lots of different effects, and the spells should do different things. In this it looks like everyone's using exactly the same spell, and it's just a faint blue wisp. The duelling doesn't look violent for the most part in the crowd battling clips. They just added lots of flashing lights that don't do anything. It just looks like a hundred people flashing little flashlights and torches at each other. In OOTP for example, and in the Cafe attack, the spells were explosive and caused damage, it felt like there was a bombardment going on all around them in the OOTP battle. Contrast that with the duelling at Malfoy Manor, where they are just flashing light back and forward, using the same curses and same shields. It's not exciting, and that's what it seems like in much of the battle. Also, there is no real choreography in it, it's all just a blur, an unstructured mass of light. The battle should have an ebb and flow, it should look like they are actually attacking each other, not just waving wands in any old way and letting the effects team shove a bit of light in where they can.
I don't know, I really hope I'm wrong, but it just looks like that to me.
On a related note, please tell me the McGonagall vs Snape duel is not just a couple of seconds of them bouncing back a little ball of fire to each other, because it so...I'm EXTREMELY DISAPPOINTED, that's worse than the book.
Also, the way it's shot isn't particularly good. The framing of the fighting is odd and not particularly exciting. Again, I can only go on what I've seen, but I expected it to be all intense with hundreds of people fighting and all these spells exploding, but that's not how it is. For one, they use the same effect for EVERY SPELL. I mean, ok they did that a bit in the other movies, but this is a proper battle, they should look different and have lots of different effects, and the spells should do different things. In this it looks like everyone's using exactly the same spell, and it's just a faint blue wisp. The duelling doesn't look violent for the most part in the crowd battling clips. They just added lots of flashing lights that don't do anything. It just looks like a hundred people flashing little flashlights and torches at each other. In OOTP for example, and in the Cafe attack, the spells were explosive and caused damage, it felt like there was a bombardment going on all around them in the OOTP battle. Contrast that with the duelling at Malfoy Manor, where they are just flashing light back and forward, using the same curses and same shields. It's not exciting, and that's what it seems like in much of the battle. Also, there is no real choreography in it, it's all just a blur, an unstructured mass of light. The battle should have an ebb and flow, it should look like they are actually attacking each other, not just waving wands in any old way and letting the effects team shove a bit of light in where they can.
I don't know, I really hope I'm wrong, but it just looks like that to me.
On a related note, please tell me the McGonagall vs Snape duel is not just a couple of seconds of them bouncing back a little ball of fire to each other, because it so...I'm EXTREMELY DISAPPOINTED, that's worse than the book.
Comments
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/film/review-23967831-harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows-part-2-in-3d---review.do 4/5
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2011958/Emma-Watson-dazzles-Harry-Potter-photo-mobbed-overeager-fans.html?ITO=1490
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/harry-potter-deathly-hallows-part-208421
http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117945605/
http://www.express.co.uk/entertainment/view/257239/Harry-Potter-And-The-Deathly-Hallows-Part-2
http://www.thewrap.com/movies/article/harry-potter-goes-out-magical-bang-28862
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/film/3681951/First-review-of-final-Harry-Potter.html
http://www.totalfilm.com/harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows-part-2 - 4/5
http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2011/jul/07/harry-potter-deathly-hallows-part-2-review - 4/5
http://adonismens.com/07/08/entertainment-news/hollywood/h-news/harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows-part-2-review/
http://www.denofgeek.com/movies/970051/harry_potter_and_the_deathly_hallows_part_2_review.html
http://www.cinepremiere.com.mx/node/17927&HOME - 5/5
http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/jkrowlingharrypotter/Film-review-Harry-Potter-and.6797846.jp - 4/5
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/movies/review/a328237/harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows-part-2-review.html - 4/5
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/reviews/first-night-harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows-part-2-leicester-square-london-2308964.html 4/5
http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/liverpool-news/in-the-mix/2011/07/08/review-harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows-part-2-12a-8-10-100252-29013272/ 8/10
http://www.blogomatic3000.com/2011/07/07/review-harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows-part-2/
http://www.bromsgrovestandard.co.uk/entertainment-review-46746.html
http://www.heyuguys.co.uk/2011/07/07/harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows-part-two-review/?utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=twitterfeed
http://www.snitchseeker.com/harry-potter-news/snitchseeker-review-harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows-part-2-a-82522/
http://www.rupertgrintpress.com/icms-review-1-harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows-part-2/
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2012455/Harry-Potter-And-The-Deathly-Hallows-Part-2-review-Final-film-anti-climax.html - 4/5
http://www.emanuellevy.com/review/harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows-part-2/ - A-
http://www.empireonline.com/reviews/reviewcomplete.asp?FID=137029 - 4/5
http://www.surreycomet.co.uk/leisure/9130422.REVIEW__Harry_Potter___The_Deathly_Hallows__Part_2/
http://www.glamourmagazine.co.uk/celebrity/entertainment/monitor/2011/07/harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows-part-ii-review
http://www.geektown.co.uk/2011/07/08/review-harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows-part-2/ 10/10
http://www.eatsleeplivefilm.com/harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows-part-2-3d-review/6534/ - 3/5
http://entertainment.ie/movie_review/Harry-Potter-and-the-Deathly-Hallows:-Part-II/7588.htm#.Thc3TXigBT8.twitter - 3/5
http://www.filmchronicles.com/harry-potter-7-2-late-night-review/
http://moo-vfarm.com/2011/07/08/harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows-part-2-2011-film-review/ - 8/10
http://www.screendaily.com/reviews/latest-reviews/-harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows-part-2/5029674.article?referrer=RSS
http://uk.movies.yahoo.com/blog/article/221834/harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows-part-2reviewed.html 4/5
http://www.3news.co.nz/Harry-Potter-and-the-Deathly-Hallows-Part-2-review/tabid/418/articleID/218166/Default.aspx - 4/5
http://whatculture.com/film/review-harry-potter-the-deathly-hallows-part-2.php - 4/5
http://staticmass.net/cinema/harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows-part-2-movie-2011-review/ - 5/5
http://www.theshiznit.co.uk/review/harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows-part-2.php - 4/5
http://www.thehollywoodnews.com/2011/07/09/review-harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows-part-2/ (4/5)
http://www.theshiznit.co.uk/review/harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows-part-2.php (Positive)
http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/257568/Harry-Potter-And-The-Deathly-Hallows-Part-2-film-review-and-trailer/
http://www.hypable.com/harry-potter/2011/07/09/hypables-first-harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows-part-2-review/ 5/5
http://lifestyle.inquirer.net/5099/harry-potter-forever
http://bestforfilm.com/film-reviews/harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows-part-2/ 4.5/5
http://www.dorkadore.com/film-tv/harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows-part-2-dork-review/
http://movies.sky.com/harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows-part-2/review 5/5
http://www.theprimateperspective.com/2011/07/film-harry-potter-the-deathly-hallows-part-ii-irish-correspondent/ 5/5
http://blogs.indiewire.com/thompsononhollywood/2011/07/09/harry_potter_and_the_deathly_hallows_part_2/
http://www.mirror.co.uk/celebs/columnists/mark-adams/2011/07/10/new-harry-potter-film-is-just-wand-erful-115875-23259907/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter 5/5
http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/notw/nol_showbiz/nolcelebrity_movies/1348661/This-isnrsquot-just-a-magnificent-send-off-to-the-series-Itrsquos-a-high-watermark-in-British-filmmaking.html 5/5
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/sunday-heraldsun/saving-the-best-for-last/story-e6frf92f-1226091294562
http://www.slashfilm.com/harry-potter-deathly-hallows-part-2-movie-review/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+slashfilm+(/Film) 8.5/10
http://www.ayushveda.com/harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows-part-2-–-review/
http://alone-in-the-dark-pg.blogspot.com/ 5/5
http://www.premiere.fr/Cinema/Dossiers-cinema/Dossier-special-Harry-Potter-et-les-reliques-de-la-mort-1833535/(view)/news/(newsid)/2807930 5/5
Look through them
Mysterious thing time.
Mysterious thing time.
The reviews are 100% against what he told us.
Mysterious thing time.
Mysterious thing time.
The book's battle was good; saved by the beyond * brilliant* emotional aspects.
But Yates is making it cinematically good without butchering J.K Rowling's careful work.
If it's not good to you then, oh well.
Mysterious thing time.
I'm only worried about the length of the battle. I don't want it to be rushed. But the content will be, no doubt, spectacular.
Fact, the series is known for it's FX
Mysterious thing time.
They hatin
Mysterious thing time.
http://harrypotterforum.com/discussion/1402/how-will-they-handle-the-muggle-born-persecution#Item_2
http://harrypotterforum.com/discussion/1466/so-hermiones-hands...#Item_36
http://harrypotterforum.com/discussion/1480/so-they-arent-including-the-bit-where#Item_10
http://harrypotterforum.com/discussion/1479/the-nagini-scene#Item_29
http://harrypotterforum.com/discussion/1855/so-much-for-that-aggressive-marketing-campaign#Item_30
http://harrypotterforum.com/discussion/1969/so-emma-sheared-off-most-of-her-hair...#Item_51
http://harrypotterforum.com/discussion/2157/comparing-the-mirror-and-map...
http://harrypotterforum.com/discussion/4341/one-thing-that-was-disappointing-about-part-1
http://harrypotterforum.com/discussion/4887/they-changed-the-lightning-effect-at-the-end-of-part-1.#Item_18
http://harrypotterforum.com/discussion/5560/no-wormtail
http://harrypotterforum.com/discussion/5582/wait-so-how-does-voldemort-die/p1
http://harrypotterforum.com/discussion/6067/the-visual-effects...#Item_245
http://harrypotterforum.com/discussion/6618/why-did-wb-never-release-all-the-scripts
Mysterious thing time.
hes voicing some doubt, let him be
#-O
He does :-D
Mysterious thing time.
I actually have many things about the movies which I would strongly praise (notice I praised OOTP and Part 1 in my first post), I just mention the negative mainly because this forum needs a balance over OMG EVERYTHING IS EPIC I WANT TO SUCK YATES'S SCROTUM, as some members do. Now I don't begrudge anyone who has a valid opinion that is positive who can back it up, however I find it mindnumbing when people blindly praise the movies where credit is not due. I'm not afraid to point out flaws I think are there, but you'll notice I back it up with reasons, as I did extensively in my first post.
Therefore I think it is you who has been proven wrong morse. The only reason me pointing out flaws could possibly annoy you is if you're aware of them and touchy about admitting them, because otherwise you wouldn't be bothered and would have a well reasoned debate.
http://harrypotterforum.com/discussion/comment/200482#Comment_200482
http://harrypotterforum.com/discussion/comment/201506#Comment_201506
And no prob brave