Guys. I think we should talk about "international" and "other language" reviews? Should we count it, or only from sources that are really important in these other countries?
Meh, one mixed one. We haven't gotten a negative one yet, 30 reviews in. That's amazing.
EDIT: Is it lukewarm positive? I wanna read it
Here's the last paragraph
Overall Part 2 is a highly entertaining and gripping second half of a film. The final scenes conclude the end of the Potter era nicely. Great looking CGI goes hand-in-hand with mouth watering battle scenes and set pieces, but ultimately falls a little flat during pivotal moments. Plot revelations don’t shock; they merely contextualise an overall plot that, as a franchise, captures not only my imagination, but that of countless others.
I don't get it. Many critics praise the slow, emotional, 'pivotal' moments in the movie saying the performances and execution are brilliant. But then comes some of those who says the action is incredible but the emotional moments fall flat. I don't tend to agree with those.
I wouldn't worry about that, Jason, viewers engage with the characters on varying levels so it's normal for non-potter fans to like this film just for the action scenes.
It's a positive review overall. It's mixed, actually, but leans towards being positive.
I don't get this either. I mean, most critics said that the section: Boathouse-Triage-Memories-Sacrifice Walk-Resurrection Stone-King's Cross is probably the best in the entire series, yet some others say that the action sequences are thrilling and great, but this section messes the pace of the film/or isn't as emotional as it could be. Well, this reminds me of people loving the first hour of Part 1 and others loving the quiet second hour of the film.
And I'm trying to understand something here. What do they want from a HP film? Do they want quality in-depth character development and drama or non-stop fascinating spectacle? What do they actually expect? 'Cause I don't understand...
It's a positive review overall. It's mixed, actually, but leans towards being positive.
I don't get this either. I mean, most critics said that the section: Boathouse-Triage-Memories-Sacrifice Walk-Resurrection Stone-King's Cross is probably the best in the entire series, yet some others say that the action sequences are thrilling and great, but this section messes the pace of the film/or isn't as emotional as it could be. Well, this reminds me of people loving the first hour of Part 1 and others loving the quiet second hour of the film.
And I'm trying to understand something here. What do they want from a HP film? Do they want quality in-depth character development and drama or non-stop fascinating spectacle? What do they actually expect? 'Cause I don't understand...
Some of the reviews are very underwhelming to me... They try to hard to critique the film from what they think it should be, which apparently is perfect. They wanted more action is the previous films, and now they want it to slow down some lol
I'll tell you this: Critics aside, this has so much in it that its stand alone value will be tremendous without knowing much about the plot. Its just going to be an absolutely amazing and enjoyable film. And People will cry and applaud.
"If you make yourself more than just a man... If you devote yourself to an ideal... You become something else entirely- A Legend."
Still far from a great, or even a good film, it offers the type of satisfactory closure to a series not seen since Lord of the Rings. Bitch... You are a HATER!
Rotten? Why? He says that the film offers emotion and spectacle and it's the proper ending for the fans. 'Bring tissues' etc. He only says that in his opinion it's not a great film and it's pretty obvious he doesn't really like the series, like, at all. :P
As the sign advertised "It All Ends Here," all ends here, so it was written, between curiosity and eagerness to see the last chapter, I'm about to accommodate me in my seat and see how literally, the film explodes, it explodes in every way and certainly does not disappoint. We have to thank in advance, they have left all the meat on the grill to finish. Yates, faithful to the books and his style, solve all mysteries remaining, squeezing ever more effective slope of the series, without neglecting their characters. The leading trio accomplished without great fanfare, this estimable desire to give their characters a maturity more visible, but the great joy I carry with Snape finally see it in full swing, a character vital to the outcome history. An outcome not without a climax vibrant epic, culminating in the anticipated showdown between Voldemort and Harry.
I doubt there is such a treasure film roster side by now well known and recognized, but impossible to ignore. During these 10 years the parade of British performers have lofty delight any fan Potterian and any good movie buff.
In short, I find it hard to be objective, I know good hand that is not round, carries many of the edges of movies past, but I do not care. I leave the theater after viewing short of a surreal feel to shelve a chapter of my life invades me and saddens me ... I do not want me more ... the initial shock that took me to leave the room I find it difficult to channel and give comfort ... I do not want me more ... I repeat again and again mentally, but in spite of everything, so it was written ... "It All Ends Here"
Comments
http://www.filmaffinity.com/es/review/98141150.html
He says that the first part of the movie is better. The pace is very fast and contains short scenes.
Anyway, it's positive so that's good.
I think we should only count the reviews from big publications and newspapers.
http://www.eatsleeplivefilm.com/harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows-part-2-3d-review/6534/
EDIT:
Is it lukewarm positive? I wanna read it
Overall Part 2 is a highly entertaining and gripping second half of a film. The final scenes conclude the end of the Potter era nicely. Great looking CGI goes hand-in-hand with mouth watering battle scenes and set pieces, but ultimately falls a little flat during pivotal moments. Plot revelations don’t shock; they merely contextualise an overall plot that, as a franchise, captures not only my imagination, but that of countless others.
He gave it 3/5
I don't get this either. I mean, most critics said that the section: Boathouse-Triage-Memories-Sacrifice Walk-Resurrection Stone-King's Cross is probably the best in the entire series, yet some others say that the action sequences are thrilling and great, but this section messes the pace of the film/or isn't as emotional as it could be.
Well, this reminds me of people loving the first hour of Part 1 and others loving the quiet second hour of the film.
And I'm trying to understand something here. What do they want from a HP film? Do they want quality in-depth character development and drama or non-stop fascinating spectacle? What do they actually expect? 'Cause I don't understand...
I'll tell you this: Critics aside, this has so much in it that its stand alone value will be tremendous without knowing much about the plot. Its just going to be an absolutely amazing and enjoyable film. And People will cry and applaud.
Lord Stafford.
3/5
Mixed or positive?
http://entertainment.ie/movie_review/Harry-Potter-and-the-Deathly-Hallows:-Part-II/7588.htm#.Thc3TXigBT8.twitter
Still far from a great, or even a good film, it offers the type of satisfactory closure to a series not seen since Lord of the Rings.
Bitch... You are a HATER!
Omg, that's hilarious.
Btw, did Armond White like DotM?
Lord Stafford.
I don´t know if i have writhe something coherent but i´m learning a lot of English thanks to this page!
W.T.F
Oh, and let's not forget "Harmonie".
X(
This review is far from legit.
Lord Stafford.
It's a positive review. He obviously dislikes the series.
Lord Stafford.
It's clear this person is a hater of Harry Potter, so I guess it's lucky that he gave it a 3/5. Although I think it might be considered rotten in RT.
I feel like he knew the film was good, but being the hater he is, he had to give it the lowest possible score one can give a obviously good film. :P
Lord Stafford.
It's mixed, but more positive than negative.
Lord Stafford.
Lord Stafford.
(well that was the cheesiest joke ever)
Lord Stafford.
I used google translator.
BEWARE
As the sign advertised "It All Ends Here," all ends here, so it was written, between curiosity and eagerness to see the last chapter, I'm about to accommodate me in my seat and see how literally, the film explodes, it explodes in every way and certainly does not disappoint. We have to thank in advance, they have left all the meat on the grill to finish.
Yates, faithful to the books and his style, solve all mysteries remaining, squeezing ever more effective slope of the series, without neglecting their characters. The leading trio accomplished without great fanfare, this estimable desire to give their characters a maturity more visible, but the great joy I carry with Snape finally see it in full swing, a character vital to the outcome history. An outcome not without a climax vibrant epic, culminating in the anticipated showdown between Voldemort and Harry.
I doubt there is such a treasure film roster side by now well known and recognized, but impossible to ignore. During these 10 years the parade of British performers have lofty delight any fan Potterian and any good movie buff.
In short, I find it hard to be objective, I know good hand that is not round, carries many of the edges of movies past, but I do not care. I leave the theater after viewing short of a surreal feel to shelve a chapter of my life invades me and saddens me ... I do not want me more ... the initial shock that took me to leave the room I find it difficult to channel and give comfort ... I do not want me more ... I repeat again and again mentally, but in spite of everything, so it was written ... "It All Ends Here"