in the book its not mentioned what spell molly used but i FEAR in the movie she WILL SAY AK and kill bellatrix which really maligns molly,s charecter IMO
The film also includes a single and aggressively directed use of the word 'bitch', during a fight scene. The Guidelines at '12A'/'12' state 'Moderate language is allowed'. There are also several uses of milder language, such as 'bloody' and 'bloody hell'
I think I just saw a new TV Spot. At first I didn't think it was new cause it seemed really similar to an old one, but it had a new shot of Harry, Ron and Hermione running into the courtyard with lightning striking the steps right next to them. Like if a Death eater shoot a spell at them.
Oh, and the TV spot that's really similar to it was the one with Ron saying, "That doesn't sound good."
Edit: I just check, it was TV spot 4 on the WB YouTube channel. The whole montage with the title cards had different footage, including that new shot(maybe some others, not sure).
IDEA: (idk if this was mentioned though) Maybe Molly doesnt kill her with AK and THEN bellatrix turns to dust or whatever. I think Molly will kill her by making her disintegrate instead of killing her with AK.
From Snitcheeker's twitter: Just got word that a new Deathly Hallows: Part 2 clip aired on ABCFamily Sunday night during 'College Road Trip'. Let us know if you got it!
From Snitcheeker's twitter: Just got word that a new Deathly Hallows: Part 2 clip aired on ABCFamily Sunday night during 'College Road Trip'. Let us know if you got it!
unbelievable, i can't use "Look back" on my cable to see Road trip, in fact my enhanced settings won't work for ABC family but all other channels...fml.
I'm very eager to know what this clip/tv spot was...
~I have NOT read the Potter books, only watched the movies FYI.
At the beginning of the television spot with the Dumbledore voice-over, there's a shot of something reflected in greyish water, just before a rather brief and confusing shot of Voldemort seemingly entering a room. Are these from the boathouse?
Was that Sirius putting the cloak ontop of Harry, Ron and Hermione?
No, of course not. That is Ron disguised as Dragomir, and i might i say... those are some pretty bad special effects.
Lord Stafford.
It's the same effect they've always used for the invisibility cloak. Looks fine. Makes no sense to change it now.
No, it isn't. They're not even using a green cloak like they used to, it has been added in afterwards... that has already been said, and it is rather easy to tell.
Was that Sirius putting the cloak ontop of Harry, Ron and Hermione?
No, of course not. That is Ron disguised as Dragomir, and i might i say... those are some pretty bad special effects.
Lord Stafford.
It's the same effect they've always used for the invisibility cloak. Looks fine. Makes no sense to change it now.
No, it isn't. They're not even using a green cloak like they used to, it has been added in afterwards... that has already been said, and it is rather easy to tell.
Was that Sirius putting the cloak ontop of Harry, Ron and Hermione?
No, of course not. That is Ron disguised as Dragomir, and i might i say... those are some pretty bad special effects.
Lord Stafford.
It's the same effect they've always used for the invisibility cloak. Looks fine. Makes no sense to change it now.
the effect was different in the first 2 movies and they changed it in 6 so.....
No, they didn't. In half blood prince they used the same type of greenscreen cloak. The same technique was used when Harry puts it on at Christmas and says "MY BODY'S GONE!".
Was that Sirius putting the cloak ontop of Harry, Ron and Hermione?
No, of course not. That is Ron disguised as Dragomir, and i might i say... those are some pretty bad special effects.
Lord Stafford.
It's the same effect they've always used for the invisibility cloak. Looks fine. Makes no sense to change it now.
the effect was different in the first 2 movies and they changed it in 6 so.....
No, they didn't. It's a greenscreen cloak. The same technique is used when Harry puts it on at Christmas and says "MY BODY'S GONE!".
you were talking about the effect when they dissapear and appear right? , because that effect has been changed for sure!
I'm not sure what kind of "effect" you mean. There's no CGI involved. They just put greenscreen on what they want to disappear. Someone's there, then they're not. It's not very complicated.
I've already said what they've changed about it. So, why are you all still deliberating?!
Lord Stafford.
Because unless you've seen the BTS of them not using a greenscreen cloak in that scene your opinion of how they created it is not fact.
If that's the truth I'm sorry, I must have missed it. Told by whom, when?
The reason I thought they still do it the old way is because for Half Blood Prince there is behind the scenes footage of them clearly still using a green colored cloak for the train scene, but they must have changed how they do it since then.
If that's the truth I'm sorry, I must have missed it. Told by whom, when?
The reason I thought they still do it the old way is because for Half Blood Prince there is behind the scenes footage of them clearly still using a green colored cloak for the train scene, but they must have changed how they do it since then.
Which "Lord" are you referring too? Me, and Stafford. I assume your are referring to Stafford.
If that's the truth I'm sorry, I must have missed it. Told by whom, when?
The reason I thought they still do it the old way is because for Half Blood Prince there is behind the scenes footage of them clearly still using a green colored cloak for the train scene, but they must have changed how they do it since then.
I can't remember who told me or when they told me, but i have a good memory with WHAT i have been told. They didn't even want to use the cloak, so, they decided to do this... i don't know why for certain, but i know it's the truth, because it is so evident in the new shot of it.
Comments
Confirmation HERE : http://www.bbfc.co.uk/AFF279024/
The film also includes a single and aggressively directed use of the word 'bitch', during a fight scene. The Guidelines at '12A'/'12' state 'Moderate language is allowed'. There are also several uses of milder language, such as 'bloody' and 'bloody hell'
Source : http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http://www.harrylatino.com/noticias/7225/buro-confirma-el-uso-de-la-palabra-bitch-en-la-pelicula-de-parte-2
Edit: I just check, it was TV spot 4 on the WB YouTube channel. The whole montage with the title cards had different footage, including that new shot(maybe some others, not sure).
Just got word that a new Deathly Hallows: Part 2 clip aired on ABCFamily Sunday night during 'College Road Trip'. Let us know if you got it!
a clip?!
~I have NOT read the Potter books, only watched the movies FYI.
~I have NOT read the Potter books, only watched the movies FYI.
I'm very eager to know what this clip/tv spot was...
~I have NOT read the Potter books, only watched the movies FYI.
I don't remember Harry saying 'It's good to see you too, Professor'. :-?
~I have NOT read the Potter books, only watched the movies FYI.
Lord Stafford.
Lord Stafford.
Lord Stafford.
Agree. I see no problem with it.
Lord Stafford.
This is not my opinion, it is what we've all been told.
Lord Stafford.
If that's the truth I'm sorry, I must have missed it. Told by whom, when?
The reason I thought they still do it the old way is because for Half Blood Prince there is behind the scenes footage of them clearly still using a green colored cloak for the train scene, but they must have changed how they do it since then.
Which "Lord" are you referring too? Me, and Stafford.
I assume your are referring to Stafford.
Lord Stafford.
Lord Stafford.