NEW PICTURE OF THE FINISHED GRINGOTTS DRAGON!!!!!!!!!! EEEEEEEEEEK!!!!!!

GodricGryffindor · May 2011

AAAAAAAAAAAH!!!!!!!!!

SO BADASS!!!! B-)

G.G.

Lord_Darkeyes · May 2011

Still looks pretty animated.

Nick · May 2011

cool

GodricGryffindor · May 2011

Still looks pretty animated.

I absolutely love the way you killed my exciment.

:-W

G.G.

sirius123 · May 2011

UHP posted it first...

Lord_Darkeyes · May 2011

Still looks pretty animated.
I absolutely love the way you killed my exciment.

I'm sorry.

:-W

G.G.

Nick · May 2011

IT LOOKS AWESOME!!! the visuals once again are top notch haters like hpscriptwriter be dammed

GodricGryffindor · May 2011

UHP posted it first...

Keep it coming, guys.

G.G.

Lord_Darkeyes · May 2011

IT LOOKS AWESOME!!! the visuals once again are top notch haters like hpscriptwriter be dammed

I'm not hating it. I think that the trailer version looks better. And can you stop being so hasty?

SwedishSkinJer · May 2011

In terms of design, it's even better than I imagined the Gringotts dragon - in particular, I like its snout and the sharp, hair-like protrusions from the back of its head. It looks sufficiently emaciated and milky-toned, as if it's been deprived for years.

SwedishSkinJer · May 2011

And is it my fuzzy recollections, or are those gooey, scab-like wounds going down its neck new?

aaron · May 2011

Look at those steely scales, jesus.

GodricGryffindor · May 2011

And is it my fuzzy recollections, or are those gooey, scab-like wounds going down its neck new?

Yes, they are new

G.G.

Lord_Darkeyes · May 2011

Am I seriously the only one who thinks this looks totally fake?

SwedishSkinJer · May 2011

Its tone definitely looks much milkier than it previously did in the first cross-over Part 1/II trailer. I like the tonal change.

GodricGryffindor · May 2011

Look at those steely scales, jesus.

LOL!
Rich is gonna love it.

G.G.

Richard · May 2011

As hard as steel lol

brian6 · May 2011

Where did you get that?

SwedishSkinJer · May 2011

Am I seriously the only one who thinks this looks totally fake?

You're probably not the only one (Braveheart would probably concur with you, as he is demonstratably not a fan of some of the visual effects, as would Henrick). As for me, though, I differ on that count - these films have had some of the most accomplished visual effects houses working alongside the other departments, and it shows here in spades. The level of detail in demonstrating how emaciated and wounded the dragon is is simply immaculate, in my opinion. I'd even say that this is one of the most interesting-looking dragons I've seen in a fantasy blockbuster of the last decade.

mattStrelow · May 2011

I'm sorry to say this, but I didn't like it...
Looks way too fake

Nick · May 2011

oh geez here we go. its just a picture it will look way better in the film

Lord_Darkeyes · May 2011

I'm sorry to say this, but I didn't like it...
Looks way too fake

Thank you,

SwedishSkinJer · May 2011

It looks utterly on par with any creature effect I've seen in a blockbuster project for a major studio, but to each his own. I'm one of the people who thought that some of the effects in Inception looked fake, so I'm clearly not one to judge when others find themselves on the other side of a seemingly high majority.

Lord_Darkeyes · May 2011

Am I seriously the only one who thinks this looks totally fake?
You're probably not the only one (Braveheart would probably concur with you, as he is demonstratably not a fan of some of the visual effects, as would Henrick). As for me, though, I differ on that count - these films have had some of the most accomplished visual effects houses working alongside the other departments, and it shows here in spades. The level of detail in demonstrating how emaciated and wounded the dragon is is simply immaculate, in my opinion. I'd even say that this is one of the most interesting-looking dragons I've seen in a fantasy blockbuster of the last decade.

I really like the way the dragon is designed. Like it's neglected and all, it just looks to placed, and something you would find in a video game.

SwedishSkinJer · May 2011

oh geez here we go. its just a picture it will look way better in the film

I'm not sure if Oclumenia gave any indication that it's "finished", but it clearly has new details on its design.

SwedishSkinJer · May 2011

Am I seriously the only one who thinks this looks totally fake?
You're probably not the only one (Braveheart would probably concur with you, as he is demonstratably not a fan of some of the visual effects, as would Henrick). As for me, though, I differ on that count - these films have had some of the most accomplished visual effects houses working alongside the other departments, and it shows here in spades. The level of detail in demonstrating how emaciated and wounded the dragon is is simply immaculate, in my opinion. I'd even say that this is one of the most interesting-looking dragons I've seen in a fantasy blockbuster of the last decade.
I really like the way the dragon is designed. Like it's neglected and all, it just looks to placed, and something you would find in a video game.

That "video game" wording is perhaps a smidge too harsh, especially when you consider films where no obvious effort was put into the special effects - say, The Last Airbender's bending, to name a recent example from a major studio - but I will reiterate: to each his own. I see nothing here that is even remotely below par in terms of integration with the live-action elements, and it's clearly more detailed (and integrated) than a mere video game graphic, IMO.

GodricGryffindor · May 2011

It looks utterly on par with any creature effect I've seen in a blockbuster project for a major studio, but to each his own. I'm one of the people who thought that some of the effects in Inception looked fake, so I'm clearly not one to judge when others find themselves on the other side of a seemingly high majority.

I agree 100%, but anyway.

G.G.

Lord_Darkeyes · May 2011

Am I seriously the only one who thinks this looks totally fake?
You're probably not the only one (Braveheart would probably concur with you, as he is demonstratably not a fan of some of the visual effects, as would Henrick). As for me, though, I differ on that count - these films have had some of the most accomplished visual effects houses working alongside the other departments, and it shows here in spades. The level of detail in demonstrating how emaciated and wounded the dragon is is simply immaculate, in my opinion. I'd even say that this is one of the most interesting-looking dragons I've seen in a fantasy blockbuster of the last decade.
I really like the way the dragon is designed. Like it's neglected and all, it just looks to placed, and something you would find in a video game.
That "video game" wording is perhaps a smidge too harsh, especially when you consider films where no obvious effort was put into the special effects - say, The Last Airbender's bending, to name a recent example from a major studio - but I will reiterate: to each his own. I see nothing here that is even remotely below par in terms of integration with the live-action elements, and it's clearly more detailed (and integrated) than a mere video game graphic, IMO.

not saying it looks directly from a video game, but it looks quite over textured, and not shaded.

SwedishSkinJer · May 2011

Just for reference, Oclumencia seemingly did not give any indication as to whether or not it's finished, and if they did, that may have not been authoritative speaking on their part - just guesswork if it's an updated still. There are new details on the design but as for whether or not they are indicative of the details that will be on what we see in the theaters, well, the jury is still out given the lack of context on the still.

SwedishSkinJer · May 2011

Am I seriously the only one who thinks this looks totally fake?
You're probably not the only one (Braveheart would probably concur with you, as he is demonstratably not a fan of some of the visual effects, as would Henrick). As for me, though, I differ on that count - these films have had some of the most accomplished visual effects houses working alongside the other departments, and it shows here in spades. The level of detail in demonstrating how emaciated and wounded the dragon is is simply immaculate, in my opinion. I'd even say that this is one of the most interesting-looking dragons I've seen in a fantasy blockbuster of the last decade.
I really like the way the dragon is designed. Like it's neglected and all, it just looks to placed, and something you would find in a video game.
That "video game" wording is perhaps a smidge too harsh, especially when you consider films where no obvious effort was put into the special effects - say, The Last Airbender's bending, to name a recent example from a major studio - but I will reiterate: to each his own. I see nothing here that is even remotely below par in terms of integration with the live-action elements, and it's clearly more detailed (and integrated) than a mere video game graphic, IMO.

not saying it looks directly from a video game, but it looks quite over textured, and not shaded.

I'm seeing some definite shading there, particularly with the dragon's head and belly. Whether or not it's sufficient is debatable.

GodricGryffindor · May 2011

Am I seriously the only one who thinks this looks totally fake?
You're probably not the only one (Braveheart would probably concur with you, as he is demonstratably not a fan of some of the visual effects, as would Henrick). As for me, though, I differ on that count - these films have had some of the most accomplished visual effects houses working alongside the other departments, and it shows here in spades. The level of detail in demonstrating how emaciated and wounded the dragon is is simply immaculate, in my opinion. I'd even say that this is one of the most interesting-looking dragons I've seen in a fantasy blockbuster of the last decade.
I really like the way the dragon is designed. Like it's neglected and all, it just looks to placed, and something you would find in a video game.
That "video game" wording is perhaps a smidge too harsh, especially when you consider films where no obvious effort was put into the special effects - say, The Last Airbender's bending, to name a recent example from a major studio - but I will reiterate: to each his own. I see nothing here that is even remotely below par in terms of integration with the live-action elements, and it's clearly more detailed (and integrated) than a mere video game graphic, IMO.

not saying it looks directly from a video game, but it looks quite over textured, and not shaded.

How could it be shaded if there's a lamp
right in front of it?
Also if you look right underneath
its wings, there's a nice shade there.

Also I'm quite sure that this is not the
final lightning. The finished cinematography
will be much better

G.G.

GodricGryffindor · May 2011

Wow, that looks amazing. Kudos to the SFX crew.

Thank you.
At least someone appreciates
this QUALITY.

G.G.

SwedishSkinJer · May 2011

If you notice, the dragon's flesh looks significantly brighter around its lower/upper neck and head - where it's more directly being hit by the many sources of light in the room, such as the lit lamp directly in front of its head - whereas its underbelly, which has some covering from the wings, is much darker, as it's not nearly as exposed to the overt brightness. There's a lot of subtle detailing here that I greatly appreciate.

Lord_Darkeyes · May 2011

As shaded I meant blended in. It looks too much like a foreground, than just something that is in there.

blackvenom · May 2011

Wow. The design and details are mind-blowing. Oscar-worthy stuff. The lighting is too 'warm' and it doesn't flatter the CGI.

I'm sure it'll be different in the final cut.

SwedishSkinJer · May 2011

In terms of the details on the design, I would concur that it's Oscar-worthy. For instance, look at the flab around the dragon's neck, suggesting that it was severely underfed and has excess lost weight hanging around. You can also see some of its veins popping around its stomach, along with some subtle cutting that's not initially as visible.

SwedishSkinJer · May 2011

As shaded I meant blended in. It looks too much like a foreground, than just something that is in there.

Ah. In that case, I still disagree with you (in terms of its integration, I don't think that it looks too placed in the foreground, and its interaction with the light sources suggest a reaction to the immediate environment), but I understand where you are coming from.

Lord_Darkeyes · May 2011

My guess is that this picture isn't even color corrected, so...

Lord_Darkeyes · May 2011

I made a graded version, and I'm much more happy with it. I'm sure their grading will make it look even better.

Richard · May 2011

What i love is that you can tell its blind

SwedishSkinJer · May 2011

Yes! The severe milkiness of its eyes are more emphasized here.

Lord_Darkeyes · May 2011

What i love is that you can tell its blind

same.

LupinTheGreat · May 2011

I like it, it looks just fine imo. Most movie goers like myself won't be analyzing the dragon, we'll just enjoy the scene. Anyway's you guys should just wait until the film is released to determine how it looks. The dragon's full effects will be finished and spiffy!

dobby_freak19 · May 2011

Ilike the body better. But they did something weird with his face. I like the trailer head better (look at my sig)

XDMorsmordreXD · May 2011

I don't see why we're 'eeking'?
This isn't a new picture and I could BARELY see a difference.

Nick · May 2011

lolo eeeking hilarious

dobby_freak19 · May 2011

I don't see why we're 'eeking'?
This isn't a new picture and I could BARELY see a difference.

well youre not observing well. there are diferences

Ash · May 2011

blackvenom · May 2011

Well, comparing these 3 shots, the new one is definitely the best one and the most finished version.

Wolf_Potter · May 2011

JUNE TRAILER:

TODAY'S PIC:

I definitely love the second one (new), IT LOOKS REAL enough for me. The body, skin, eyes (everything) are more detailed on the new dragon (I know, the first picture is almost a year old). If you look carefully the first dragon isn't blind.

I don't think the dragon looks fake.

HPScriptWriter: are you ok? LOL that's your opinion, but I think you're wrong man

It looks very real for me

Also, this is just a pic... without cinematography. It'll be better in the movie

blackvenom · May 2011

Well, the entire dragon is perfect. It's its face that 'looks' fake, because of the massive beam of light falling on its cheek/mouth. The June shot doesn't have this. I insist. The details and design of the dragon are stunning.

NEW PICTURE OF THE FINISHED GRINGOTTS DRAGON!!!!!!!!!! EEEEEEEEEEK!!!!!!

Comments