Home General
Welcome to Harry Potter Forum! Below you will find many interesting threads and discussions. Enjoy.

Part II to be 2 hours 40 minutes?

13»

Comments

  • NickNick Posts: 20,653 ✭✭✭✭✭
    im simply going by what test screeners already CONFIRMED that the movie is EXACTLY 2 hours long. at the very least there not cutting anything from the test screening.
  • blackvenomblackvenom Posts: 3,257
    Way too early. The official runtime will be released sometime in mid/late June. This is just speculation.
  • Accio_LogAccio_Log Posts: 2,632 ✭✭✭
    nahhh part will be on par with part 1 2 hours 10 minutes of FILM FOOTAGE and 17 minutes of stupid ass credits EPIC FAIL
    Not a fan of giving credit where credit is due or just dont like that its included in the running time?
    Image and video hosting by TinyPicImage and video hosting by TinyPic
  • blackvenomblackvenom Posts: 3,257
    The end credits are important and should be included in the film's running time. All the people who worked on the film are mentioned there. It's an important part of the film.
  • Accio_LogAccio_Log Posts: 2,632 ✭✭✭
    The end credits are important and should be included in the film's running time. All the people who worked on the film are mentioned there. It's an important part of the film.
    I sit through the credits every time I go see a film.
    Image and video hosting by TinyPicImage and video hosting by TinyPic
  • dobby_freak19dobby_freak19 Posts: 3,358 ✭✭✭✭
    I agree with the credits importance. But...when you go see a film, you barely sit and watch them. When a random group of people go to see a movie and check the running time, they always have the footage on mind.
    image
    Hope you like it!
  • RichardRichard Posts: 48,703 mod
    logan you sit through the credits? haha cool
  • Accio_LogAccio_Log Posts: 2,632 ✭✭✭
    logan you sit through the credits? haha cool
    Thats what happens when you marry someone that got their degree in film production ;-)
    Image and video hosting by TinyPicImage and video hosting by TinyPic
  • Accio_LogAccio_Log Posts: 2,632 ✭✭✭
    I agree with the credits importance. But...when you go see a film, you barely sit and watch them. When a random group of people go to see a movie and check the running time, they always have the footage on mind.
    I know they have the footage in mind but in reality the credits are on the same roll of film that some of the footage is on. Still part of the film so I expect it.

    It wasn't uncommon to witness others staying for the credits in L.A. either. Kind of cool to see.
    Image and video hosting by TinyPicImage and video hosting by TinyPic
  • RichardRichard Posts: 48,703 mod
    some ppl hate it when ppl stay through the credits i dont because it gives me time to rest before cleaning it lol
  • NickNick Posts: 20,653 ✭✭✭✭✭
    i just dont sit through the credits. after a movie is over im ready to go. but im waiting with bated breath to find out what the official running time of the movie is. since we already know that its 120 minutes without credits. it will be interesting to see if they add or subtract from the actual film footage.
  • aaronaaron Posts: 20,950 mod
    I usually sit through the main credits, where names come up on screen, and then the title repeat. When the rolling credits come up, I leave.
    imageimageimage
  • RichardRichard Posts: 48,703 mod
    I usually sit through the main credits, where names come up on screen, and then the title repeat. When the rolling credits come up, I leave.
    same

    like i saw the end of fast five i recommend ppl stay after credits

  • NickNick Posts: 20,653 ✭✭✭✭✭
    so im going to go ahead and call it deathly hallows part 2 will be 137 minutrs long
Sign In or Register to comment.