Welcome to Harry Potter Forum! Below you will find many interesting threads and discussions. Enjoy.
The dialogue in part 2
Pumpkinjuice
Posts: 2,317 ✭✭✭✭✭
I found some of the dialogue in part 2 quite bad. Harry's lines to Ron and Hermione at Shell Cottage seemed unnatural, as if to remind the audience of what a horcrux is and that they need to destroy them in order to kill Voldemort. Come on, Harry, they do know what a horcrux is after spending 3/4 of the year on the run with you hunting those objects. It was probably included as a reminder for the casual viewers, but yet the filmmakers didn't bother telling them how Hermione got a hair from Bellatrix, that Harry's cloak is one of the hallows or even the reason why he didn't die in the forbidden forest. It makes me wonder who they aimed the film at (if anyone), but I digress.
What do you think of it? The dialogue. What lines were good and what were bad?
What I liked the most was Harry confronting Snape in the Great Hall. That was intense.
Something I hated was Dumbledore's out of place comment about words. Really, that whole scene was quite a mess.
What do you think of it? The dialogue. What lines were good and what were bad?
What I liked the most was Harry confronting Snape in the Great Hall. That was intense.
Something I hated was Dumbledore's out of place comment about words. Really, that whole scene was quite a mess.
Comments
"Never better! I feel like... I could... Spit fire!"
Why didn't you tell her, Bellatrix?
Is he alive, Draco?
Why are so many structured like this, the lines?
Is Kloves trying to confuse them with poorly worded dialogue, the audience?
Kloves is generally a mediocre to horrendous writer, who strikes unintentionally on gold every now and then and whose scripts are carved into something acceptable by Yates and the actors. You would never think to look at HBP that it's one of the most clunky things committed to paper, the script. :P
I find a lot of Part 2 pretty badly written. I guess Kloves was just eager to get to the end.
To be honest the biggest surprise I got was after the wonderful opening montage Yates crafted to see just how ridiculous the original script actually was. A family conversation about sugar-free-biscuits? He had to be joking.
EDIT: Different interpretations than Brian, but both still work.
Lord Stafford.
But it's really a shame now that they didn't include McGonagall not liking it when Dumbledore used the name at the very beginning of SS. It would've been an awesome parallel.
Lord Stafford.
"It seems despite your exhaustive defensive strategies, you still have a bit of a security problem, Headmaster."
"Why don’t you confer with Mr. Finnigan? As I recall, he has a particular proclivity for pyrotechnics" - This one was great, since at midnight it's just the hardcore fans and they all knew why it was really funny
"Harry, you are so loved. Mama loves you. Dada loves you. Harry, be safe. Be strong. "
"It is the quality of ones convictions that determines success, not the number of followers. "
"It doesn't matter that Harry's gone. People die every day. Friends, family. Yeah, we still lost Harry tonight. He's still with us, in here."
"Come on Tom, let's finish this the way we started, together. "
All fantastic, all not from the book.
Enough said.
G.G.
It is the quality of ones convictions that determines success, not the number of followers. -Remus Lupin
Mysterious thing time.
those lines are great
J.K Rowling's humor is also two-hundred times better and *not* cheesy.
Mysterious thing time.
Did I say 'Always' or 'Of course it's happening in side your head..." or any from the book were bad? No I didn't, I said many from the film only were great.
Lord Stafford.
Lord Stafford.
And about the Tom one, it definitely counts. Especially how Dan delivers it.
Lord Stafford.
Most of the problems with dialogue I had were Neville's lines. His quips in the bridge scene, his random lust for Luna line, his speech at the end (this might be to do with delivery, but I still feel it went too much for sentimental cheesiness rather than rousing defiance like in the book). Then there were a few times he would state the obvious. "The grounds are crawling with Death Eaters and Dementors". Yeah dude, you're ruining the whole show don't tell concept. Then there was the whole rogue students hiding in the ROR because they're wanted by the Death Eaters yet still attending classes and venturing out into the school explanation which just made no sense at all.
That may seem like a lot to think was bad. But oh no, that is good for Kloves. And most of it is really pinned to the fact that he couldn't write one character convincingly.
Mysterious thing time.
Mysterious thing time.
As for how it would look on film, I wouldn't have high hopes for that to be all too well
Mysterious thing time.
Mysterious thing time.