Home General
Welcome to Harry Potter Forum! Below you will find many interesting threads and discussions. Enjoy.

Book Voldemort vs. Movie Voldemort?

XDMorsmordreXDXDMorsmordreXD Posts: 6,730 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited May 2011 in General
If you’re a fan of the series (books and movies) then I’m sure you acknowledge the differences between Lord Voldemort in the films and in the books. My question is which Voldemort do you prefer?

Personally, I like the book Voldemort loads better. I appreciate what Ralph Fiennes did, make Voldemort more of a ‘humanly’ evil (as he has said in interviews) I just felt that in the books, Lord Voldemort was even more evil; a personification of evil! His face and deformity was more obvious in the books as well. Which do you prefer?

Photobucket

VS.

Photobucket

Image and video hosting by TinyPic
Mysterious thing time.
«1

Comments

  • Lord_DarkeyesLord_Darkeyes Posts: 4,905 ✭✭✭✭
    Movie Voldemort.
    He added a more layer of expressions, and to me, is more devil like, and just more interesting.
    imageimageimage


  • XDMorsmordreXDXDMorsmordreXD Posts: 6,730 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Movie Voldemort.
    He added a more layer of expressions, and to me, is more devil like, and just more interesting.
    I don't know.
    I love Ralph Finnes interpretation, don't get me wrong.
    But, J.K Rowling's vision was better to me (the 'Cage of Light' picture)
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic
    Mysterious thing time.
  • XDMorsmordreXDXDMorsmordreXD Posts: 6,730 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I like the movie version better. More believable.
    Yeah, too human for someone whose had his soul brutally split seven times.
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic
    Mysterious thing time.
  • XDMorsmordreXDXDMorsmordreXD Posts: 6,730 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Book, and no not because im a book puritst, but because the book voldemort is more evil, loads more evil
    =D>
    Agreed lol. I don't want to sound like a book purist myself but H.P is the BOOKS to me.
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic
    Mysterious thing time.
  • HessHess Posts: 1,734 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I must confess that the first time I saw Voldemort in GOF, I was like ''wtf he's not even scary'', and to me it has always been more interesting reading him that watching him, even though Fiennes is a beast acting.
    image
  • XDMorsmordreXDXDMorsmordreXD Posts: 6,730 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I must confess that the first time I saw Voldemort in GOF, I was like ''wtf he's not even scary'', and to me it has always been more interesting reading him that watching him, even though Fiennes is a beast acting.
    Oh yes! Fiennes did it amazingly
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic
    Mysterious thing time.
  • Lord_DarkeyesLord_Darkeyes Posts: 4,905 ✭✭✭✭
    I must confess that the first time I saw Voldemort in GOF, I was like ''wtf he's not even scary'', and to me it has always been more interesting reading him that watching him, even though Fiennes is a beast acting.
    I thought the way they added a much more human like quality to him (physical wise) and not just this snake mutant like thing, made him much more scary.

    For example, I winced so much in Black Swan because of the more relatable gore, than just someone getting their head blown off.

    I love the way Voldy really taunts Harry in the GoF movie.
    imageimageimage


  • XDMorsmordreXDXDMorsmordreXD Posts: 6,730 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I must confess that the first time I saw Voldemort in GOF, I was like ''wtf he's not even scary'', and to me it has always been more interesting reading him that watching him, even though Fiennes is a beast acting.
    I thought the way they added a much more human like quality to him (physical wise) and not just this snake mutant like thing, made him much more scary.

    For example, I winced so much in Black Swan because of the more relatable gore, than just someone getting their head blown off.

    I love the way Voldy really taunts Harry in the GoF movie.
    I CAN........TOUCH YOU NOW!
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic
    Mysterious thing time.
  • Lord_DarkeyesLord_Darkeyes Posts: 4,905 ✭✭✭✭
    I must confess that the first time I saw Voldemort in GOF, I was like ''wtf he's not even scary'', and to me it has always been more interesting reading him that watching him, even though Fiennes is a beast acting.
    I thought the way they added a much more human like quality to him (physical wise) and not just this snake mutant like thing, made him much more scary.

    For example, I winced so much in Black Swan because of the more relatable gore, than just someone getting their head blown off.

    I love the way Voldy really taunts Harry in the GoF movie.
    I CAN........TOUCH YOU NOW!
    Lolololololol. I was not typing that with that line in mind ((;

    I also loved Fiennes' mood swings in GoF. I think Voldemort is the only thing I feel comfortable saying that Mike Newell would have done better than the other directors, including David Yates.
    imageimageimage


  • XDMorsmordreXDXDMorsmordreXD Posts: 6,730 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Fiennes is great!
    Jk Rowling is better :D
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic
    Mysterious thing time.
  • XDMorsmordreXDXDMorsmordreXD Posts: 6,730 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I think that image of Voldemort (the art) is actually from the mind of Mary Grand'pre, the illustrator. So it might be her idea of it, not JK Rowling's.
    Yeah, but J.K Rowling helps her with the image.
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic
    Mysterious thing time.
  • decarusdecarus Posts: 5,953 ✭✭✭
    I like how it is in the movie as well. To me more real seems more scary and disturbing then making him feel cartoony like if he had red eyes. I mean that was fine in the books. I just think real people are far more scary. I mean think of Hitler. It is more disturbing to me that it is just a guy.
  • XWingardium_LeviosaXXWingardium_LeviosaX Posts: 1,184 ✭✭✭
    edited May 2011
    Book Voldemort is definitely far more evil. However, Ralph's performance is extraordinary in my opinion. Personally, whenever I read HP I imagine Fiennes saying/doing everything book Voldemort does and its equally terrifying.
  • XDMorsmordreXDXDMorsmordreXD Posts: 6,730 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Book Voldemort is definitely far more evil. However, Ralph's performance is extraordinary in my opinion. Personally, whenever I read HP I imagine Fiennes saying/doing everything book Voldemort does and its equally terrifying.
    I'm sure we all agree Book-Voldemort is FAR more evil.
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic
    Mysterious thing time.
  • dobby_freak19dobby_freak19 Posts: 3,358 ✭✭✭✭
    Book voldemort. he´s scary and evil as hell. And doesnt go nyeaaaaaaah!! every 10 seconds..loool just kidding :P
    image
    Hope you like it!
  • XDMorsmordreXDXDMorsmordreXD Posts: 6,730 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Book voldemort. he´s scary and evil as hell. And doesnt go nyeaaaaaaah!! every 10 seconds..loool just kidding :P
    :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-))
    :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-))
    :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-))
    :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-))
    :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-))
    :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-))
    :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-))
    :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-))
    :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-))
    :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-))
    :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-))
    :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-)) :-))
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic
    Mysterious thing time.
  • decarusdecarus Posts: 5,953 ✭✭✭
    Yeah i think that Fiennes is very similar to what i imagined anyways minus the red eyes so it really works for me. Most of the characters when i read the books i still think of what i think the characters look like in my head but Voldemort is so close and McGonagall that i think the picture in my head and the actor for those two have sort of merged.
  • Festax0333Festax0333 Posts: 11,753 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Movie for me

    More layered,complex and thats what makes him a joy to watch

    Nyeaaaaaah!
    imageimageimageimageimageimage
  • VinceVince Posts: 292
    I like movie Voldemort. I just wish we'd seen more of him in the movies, that's all: his past, and scenes with him not just through Harry's dreams. The illustration on this thread doesn't fit my idea of Voldemort at all. It was never said that his face was that lizard-like. In a sense, having light blue eyes works better for Voldemort, because he is a cold character.
  • Lord_DarkeyesLord_Darkeyes Posts: 4,905 ✭✭✭✭
    Let me try to explain, so bare with me.

    The reason I like movie over book is because... Well.. Okay, take Satan for example. Satan cannot destroy love, only take and distort it. He distorts love and makes his own thing called temptation.
    Much like with Satan, the movie Voldy takes such a spiritual thing such ad human life, and distorts it to make a more evil and just terrifying thing, as apposed to something just like a snake mutant thing.
    imageimageimage


  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 7,344 ✭✭✭✭
  • Pensieve SeekerPensieve Seeker Posts: 2,916 ✭✭✭✭
    I like both.
    You kind of remind me of Marge Simpson, Melyssa, because it sounds like something she would say.

    Alcohol and calculus don't mix. Never drink and derive.

    Pottermore user name: SilverQuest212
  • RichardRichard Posts: 48,703 mod
    book voldemort for me
  • AvangelisAvangelis Posts: 81
    Movie Voldemort is too calm at times, its just very annoying. I've been waiting for the moment to see him go batshit insane and it just hasn't happened yet. Finnes is great but idk. Voldemort was really scary to me in the first movie when he was walking up to Godrics Hallow. We didn't see his face. All we saw was him pointing his wand at a helpless baby.
  • BaneBane Posts: 9,869 ✭✭✭✭✭
    We just got a trailer that showed us an entire house full of dead people after Voldemort snapped.

    I'd say that he's completely maniacal enough.
  • aaronaaron Posts: 20,950 mod
    Well, book Voldemort for me, but I have got to say that Fiennes is brilliant, and both Hero Fiennes-Tiffin and Frank Dillane are better in the film than in the book. I loved those guys.
    imageimageimage
  • BaneBane Posts: 9,869 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Also, I see too often people complaining about how he's too "calm." When I read the books I noticed that Rowling deliberately tried to make Voldemort share similarities to how Satan is said/believed to be. He's calm and relaxed but that doesn't mean he's nice. Voldemort isn't your typical surface-level evil villain. No, he preserves his masochism and hatred and others know it-- you know why Lucius is so incredibly terrified of him at the beginning of Hallows? Because while Voldemort is "calm," those familiar with him knows that it's something of a facade, that his real personality is being masked by his choice to present himself as an intellectual and elegant practitioner of dark magic.

    However, at any moment he could just snap and massacre an entire room. Film Voldemort is spot-on with book Voldemort in this regard. Let us be thankful that Rowling, nor the filmmakers, decided to dish out another cliche "rawrrrr I am teh bad!!!" villain like we oh so often get in well, fucking everything else.
  • aaronaaron Posts: 20,950 mod
    And in Part 2 we see Voldemort, for the first time on screen, feel vulnerable and desperate. And I can already tell from the bloody feet and massacres and raging screams that Fiennes is going to give us some new-territory Voldemort here.
    imageimageimage
  • BaneBane Posts: 9,869 ✭✭✭✭✭
    And in Part 2 we see Voldemort, for the first time on screen, feel vulnerable and desperate. And I can already tell from the bloody feet and massacres and raging screams that Fiennes is going to give us some new-territory Voldemort here.
    What's great is that it's not only going to allow Fiennes some room to play with the character, but also Radcliffe as well. I think the Harry/Voldemort dynamic looks stunning in Part 2, like they're really going out with this long-time-coming confrontation. You see Voldemort looking completely disheveled in Malfoy Manor after killing so many people, and you also see Harry disheveled as well to the point where he initiates an act of utter insanity for no other reason than to show his bravery and Voldemort's cowardice.
  • Lord StaffordLord Stafford Posts: 27,353 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I must confess that the first time I saw Voldemort in GOF, I was like ''wtf he's not even scary'', and to me it has always been more interesting reading him that watching him, even though Fiennes is a beast acting.
    Well, if you don't think he is scary in GOF, then you won't in the others as well, because he was definetely the scariest in GOF, since then he has been pretty much 'meh' apart from at MM in Part 1, Newell captured the perfect Voldy.

    Lord Stafford.
    image
  • Lord StaffordLord Stafford Posts: 27,353 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 2011
    I also loved Fiennes' mood swings in GoF. I think Voldemort is the only thing I feel comfortable saying that Mike Newell would have done better than the other directors, including David Yates.

    Newell captured the essence of Voldy better than anyone has, and i dare say could because of how good he was. Like i heard somewhere i can't remember... Yates is the best of the series in terms of characters, but the worst with the story, very disjointed.

    Lord Stafford.
    image
  • jonny7003jonny7003 Posts: 3,771 ✭✭
    I must confess that the first time I saw Voldemort in GOF, I was like ''wtf he's not even scary'', and to me it has always been more interesting reading him that watching him, even though Fiennes is a beast acting.
    I agree. When I first saw Voldemort in GOF, I was a bit underwhelmed. Yes, I like Fiennes' take on the character as the films have progressed, but I prefer the book Voldemort as he was more intimidating in my mind.
  • Lord StaffordLord Stafford Posts: 27,353 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Absolutely. He was far more intense and scary in the GOF film than he was in the others, much like how he is represented in the book.

    Lord Stafford.
    image
  • RichardRichard Posts: 48,703 mod
    I think hes best in gof
  • Lord StaffordLord Stafford Posts: 27,353 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I think hes best in gof
    He is.

    Lord Stafford.

    image
  • aaronaaron Posts: 20,950 mod
    Voldemort has mood swings in Malfoy Manor. I almost flipped shit when he suddenly screamed "Wormtail! What have I told you about keeping our guest quiet."
    imageimageimage
  • RichardRichard Posts: 48,703 mod
    "have i not spoken to you about keeping our guest quiet?
  • aaronaaron Posts: 20,950 mod
    Yeah yeah, whatever.
    imageimageimage
  • BraveheartBraveheart Posts: 1,910 ✭✭✭✭
    Voldemort was best in GOF by far. I think he recalled hints of GOF in Part 1 during Malfoy Manor, but I still think he should have been more unbalanced with his mood swings. He does seem to get let loose in Part 2 though and I can't wait for that.

    In the books, I liked Voldemort all the way up until DH. In that book he just became like one of those bumbling Bond villains who reveals their entire plan. He literally made every mistake it was possible to make; all for the convenience of JKR of course.
  • CarneCarne Posts: 1,928 ✭✭✭
    Book Voldemort. The movie version is just so soft and calm.
  • Pensieve SeekerPensieve Seeker Posts: 2,916 ✭✭✭✭
    Book Voldemort. The movie version is just so soft and calm.
    Rapist and serial killer Ted Bundy was soft and calm when he lured his victims.

    Alcohol and calculus don't mix. Never drink and derive.

    Pottermore user name: SilverQuest212
  • NickNick Posts: 20,653 ✭✭✭✭✭
  • CarneCarne Posts: 1,928 ✭✭✭
    Book Voldemort. The movie version is just so soft and calm.
    Rapist and serial killer Ted Bundy was soft and calm when he lured his victims.

    Why on earth would you compare Ted Bundy to Voldemort?

  • Pensieve SeekerPensieve Seeker Posts: 2,916 ✭✭✭✭
    You said the movie Voldemort was so soft and calm, and being soft and calm can be deceiving.
    Alcohol and calculus don't mix. Never drink and derive.

    Pottermore user name: SilverQuest212
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0
    For me, the main difference between them is that the Movie Voldemort is much more theatrical than the Book one.
  • BaneBane Posts: 9,869 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Huh. Something in a film more theatrical than a book. Imagine that.
  • NickNick Posts: 20,653 ✭✭✭✭✭
    lmao!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0
    edited May 2011
    I am not saying in the literal way of it, of course. What I'm trying to say is that his attitude in the movie is much more exaggerated than in the book. His emotions are much more stronger in the movie, than in the book. So... It's a theatrical acting. In teathre plays, the acting is much more intense and exaggerated.
  • BaneBane Posts: 9,869 ✭✭✭✭✭
    That's interesting. A lot of people are complaining that film Voldemort doesn't seem to be as "crazy" as book Voldemort.

    And I know what you meant. I just like to make harmless jabs.
Sign In or Register to comment.