the thing that stuck out to me is matthew lewis said it.....WAS A FUNNY SCENE.....seems there turning the battle of hogwarts into comedy time im officially pissed
the thing that stuck out to me is matthew lewis said it.....WAS A FUNNY SCENE.....seems there turning the battle of hogwarts into comedy time im officially pissed
You seem to get easily set off by the slightest thing, Nick.
Alcohol and calculus don't mix. Never drink and derive.
the thing that stuck out to me is matthew lewis said it.....WAS A FUNNY SCENE.....seems there turning the battle of hogwarts into comedy time im officially pissed
You're probably making a mountain out of a mole hill.
"Nick Moran: Yeah, we had a lot of fun. I don't want to spoil it for anybody, but Scabior comes back with an army, and you know, it was terrific. It's a whole army, and it's just facing Neville - Neville fending off a whole army. And it's a very very funny scene, a really good action sequence."
Sounds like he means it was just a fun thing to do and the idea of Neville fighting off an army by himself is funny to him.
I bet the funny bit will be Nevile channeling a bit of his old self and maybe he'll have a small "oh blimey!" moment at the amount of people charging towards him. Then he'll get over that, and start kicking ass. At least that how I can picture whatever it is in my head.
hmmm the thing that i read that worried me was Sirius's part in Dh2. Now i haven't read the books but from what i've seen, that scene is supposed to be a touching scene in which Harry speaks to Remus,Sirius,Dd and his parent's correct? Gary Oldman doesn't sound too excited about it.
~I have NOT read the Potter books, only watched the movies FYI.
I don't think there's anything to worry about. The scene really isn't THAT long in the books, and I imagine for an actor like Gary Oldman, just that once scene is a "blink and you'll miss it" role. I don't think there's anything to worry about from him not sounding too enthuastic.
Yeah I'm not worried about the forest scene with Sirius. He only has a couple of lines in the book, anyway. And he's just there. It's mostly between Harry and his parents.
Anyway, I think that the scene with the Snatchers will be cool. Logically, the army of Snatchers runs in the forest and they fight with the Hogwarts people as we saw glimpses in the June trailer. And do you remember that bridge they created in Swinley Forest? I guess that this is very close to the castle and Neville is standing there and it's the moment where he battles Scabior and he blows up the entire bridge, making a lot of Snatchers fall down and die or something. I guess that's why it is quite funny for a guy to knock out so many enemies. Dunno..
I just hope "funny" means that he had fun shooting it, and the scene itself not being funny.
Oh, who am I kidding. It's Yates, of course they'll throw in as many jokes as possible.
I disagree with this. Perhaps that's because I'm a huge fan of Yates, so our perceptions diverge strongly there, but still...
Anyway, looking at the full context of the remarks, I'm guessing that Moran is talking from perspective. Scabior arrives with the Snatchers, looking like they will be a force to reckon with, and Neville shows them the door to next week. I'm guessing he meant the scene itself is seriously played out, but for him as an actor, it was funny to essentially be taken down by a character who only comes into his own during the film, especially since Moran has done some action-heavy films where he is seriously badass himself. Role reversal and all.
Seriously, everything that we have seen of the battle so far looks deadly serious and incredibly, incredibly epic. I'm not discounting the possibility of some humor, but the emotional beats that we have seen (Ginny's recognition of Harry, seemingly dead, the shots of the castle exploding, etc) have utterly no hints of ill-placed humor.
Hmmm. I am not worried about there being too much humor, and I agree with Swed's comment above. I am not sure what to think about Neville taking on a whole army by himself...that sounds a bit over the top, but we'll see. I'm sure it'll be fine.
Like others, I'm just a bit concerned at Gary's "blink and you'll miss me" comment. I know it's a short scene, but it's more than a glimpse of him, ya know. I suspect it's just a bit of an exaggeration. I think he did only have about two lines, and as long as that's there, it's fine. I somehow doubt they will skimp on one of the most heart-wrenching moments of the series.
When I look at the "Neville vs. an army" scene, I don't imagine they mean Neville literally striking down each Snatcher 300-style. Rather, since his setpiece with the Snatchers has been confirmed to be a bridge, it will involve Neville manipulating the bridge to take them out in bulk. For instance, if Scabiour falls off of the bridge, I can see how that would be "funny" for Moran as an actor to participate in with the technical aspect of falling in a movie. So, it'll probably be more environmental than purely physical. That's merely my theory, though.
As far as Gary is concerned, it's a really touching scene, yes, but in the grand scheme of things, Sirius has roughly two lines in the book and then just silently accompanies Harry until he's near Voldemort. He's a big-name actor, so I can imagine how that would seem "small" in a sense. Not emotionally, but in terms of screentime - absolutely, IMO.
Yeah, I'm guessing that Neville will take out the bulk of the Snatcher reinforcements by doing something to the bridge itself (explosion, manipulating it with magic, etc), not just them.
EDIT:
Oh, and I just thought of something else that could potentially explain how Moran's remarks make sense in a way: when villains (especially the cocky ones) receive their comeuppance in movies, it's not necessarily a bad thing to find it funny. For example, when Hans Gruber goes out the window in Die Hard? I found that amusing because he was, much like Scabior, an unbelievably cocky sonofabitch. It didn't mean that his moment with McClane before wasn't incredibly tense and well-acted - the scene gets me every time - but much like a lot of us were laughing when the centaurs carry Umbridge off, seeing Scabior get his ass handed to him by being outsmarted by one student is in and of itself a funny comeuppance, even if the battle compotent is largely serious.
Well let's face it, Part One was pretty much non-stop comedy. I don't expect anything different here.
Non-stop comedy? Dobby's death? Both Nagini scenes? Hermione's torture? Hedwig's death? A lot more too. NOT COMEDY.
What? Dobby's death got the biggest laugh at my theater, and there was some chuckling during Hermione's torture too. Hedwig's death was another rib-tickler. Of course there were serious scenes too (George losing his ear, the Ministry infiltration, Ron's Speech). But there was a lot of humour.
Anyway back to topic. I doubt the scene will be comical in that sense. It was probably funny to Nick Moran having to do it. He was probably having a chuckle just thinking about it.
LOL, I'm not thick. I'm good and average. Not too gangly, ugly, and skinny unlike others :-"
Well let's face it, Part One was pretty much non-stop comedy. I don't expect anything different here.
Non-stop comedy? Dobby's death? Both Nagini scenes? Hermione's torture? Hedwig's death? A lot more too. NOT COMEDY.
What? Dobby's death got the biggest laugh at my theater, and there was some chuckling during Hermione's torture too. Hedwig's death was another rib-tickler. Of course there were serious scenes too (George losing his ear, the Ministry infiltration, Ron's Speech). But there was a lot of humour.
What a compelling argument, my friend! "My theater reacted this way, so the scene is objectively ___". Well, my theater was visibly upset during the scene with Dobby, so perhaps that means it was emotionally satisfying?
Seriously, you sound like an ass whose belitting comments come off as borderline disrespectful. You state that, because you reacted to certain scenes in a particular way, Part 1 was "non-stop comedy".
Also, "let's face it" has to one of the most annoyingly presumptuous things I've ever heard. It's used SO OFTEN when people cannot process the idea of others disagreeing with them, as if we're all going to say, "Oh, how silly of us, of course we poor deluded souls are wrong and you are right."
Theaters aren't automatically a good indicator of...well, much of anything. People in my theater, for example, regularly laugh at fart jokes in comedies. Am I supposed to bow to their collective artistic judgment at the expense of my own?
EDIT:
All good points, Fury. Don't forget the numerous jokes at Gimli's expense that happened during the battle scenes (Aragorn tossing him, not being able to see past the wall at Helms Deep, etc). They weren't distracting from the overall expertise of the battle, and if everything's well-executed here, Scabior acting like...well, Scabior, Harry Potter's more morally wicked answer to Jack Sparrow, won't be indicative of how the battle as a whole is treated.
Only time in my theater where people laughed was the 7 Potters transformation, when Ron made a joke, some parts during the Ministry break-in, and when Nagini jumped from the floor towards the screen(cause they all jumped in their seats).
Same here. My theater reacted accordingly in all of the obviously "emotional moments" (a group of girls in the front row with me were very visibly crying when Dobby died). Ditto for the obvious comedy with the 7 Potters sequence especially.
Even so, a lot of immature jerks are in theaters because they are accompanying a relative, significant other or friend (especially teenagers that seemingly find any emotional moment worthy of derision), so I'm not going to treat their reactions as absolute artistic consensus. One theater will react completely differently to what another theater reacts to based on what kind of people are there.
Yeah, this appears to be one of the few responses that someone who can't defend the merits of their own argument is capable of: play the "let's face it" card to act like everyone either already agrees with you or needs to "See the Light", and then laugh everything else off. If you're "laughing your ass off" this easily, then perhaps the emotional moments of Part 1 aren't at fault.
You're entitled to believe whatever you want about Part 1, but "let's face it" brings me into a side that I am not on.
Um, my theater was silent during Dobby's death and I heard some people crying. And people were gasping during Hermione's torture. The only pure comedy moments were the 7 Potters, George's 'toothbrush' scene, Dobby's short speeches, some tidbits during the Ministry infiltration and that's it.
Comments
Pottermore user name: SilverQuest212
"Nick Moran: Yeah, we had a lot of fun. I don't want to spoil it for anybody, but Scabior comes back with an army, and you know, it was terrific. It's a whole army, and it's just facing Neville - Neville fending off a whole army. And it's a very very funny scene, a really good action sequence."
Sounds like he means it was just a fun thing to do and the idea of Neville fighting off an army by himself is funny to him.
Sounds really exciting if anything.
I just hope the "funny" isn't Scabior and any henchmen being portrayed as idiotic villains.
~I have NOT read the Potter books, only watched the movies FYI.
I'm sure the scene will be great.
Anyway, I think that the scene with the Snatchers will be cool. Logically, the army of Snatchers runs in the forest and they fight with the Hogwarts people as we saw glimpses in the June trailer. And do you remember that bridge they created in Swinley Forest? I guess that this is very close to the castle and Neville is standing there and it's the moment where he battles Scabior and he blows up the entire bridge, making a lot of Snatchers fall down and die or something. I guess that's why it is quite funny for a guy to knock out so many enemies. Dunno..
Oh, who am I kidding. It's Yates, of course they'll throw in as many jokes as possible.
Anyway, looking at the full context of the remarks, I'm guessing that Moran is talking from perspective. Scabior arrives with the Snatchers, looking like they will be a force to reckon with, and Neville shows them the door to next week. I'm guessing he meant the scene itself is seriously played out, but for him as an actor, it was funny to essentially be taken down by a character who only comes into his own during the film, especially since Moran has done some action-heavy films where he is seriously badass himself. Role reversal and all.
Seriously, everything that we have seen of the battle so far looks deadly serious and incredibly, incredibly epic. I'm not discounting the possibility of some humor, but the emotional beats that we have seen (Ginny's recognition of Harry, seemingly dead, the shots of the castle exploding, etc) have utterly no hints of ill-placed humor.
Like others, I'm just a bit concerned at Gary's "blink and you'll miss me" comment. I know it's a short scene, but it's more than a glimpse of him, ya know. I suspect it's just a bit of an exaggeration. I think he did only have about two lines, and as long as that's there, it's fine. I somehow doubt they will skimp on one of the most heart-wrenching moments of the series.
As far as Gary is concerned, it's a really touching scene, yes, but in the grand scheme of things, Sirius has roughly two lines in the book and then just silently accompanies Harry until he's near Voldemort. He's a big-name actor, so I can imagine how that would seem "small" in a sense. Not emotionally, but in terms of screentime - absolutely, IMO.
he will most likely stun some off them, and then blow up alot more :-D
EDIT:
Oh, and I just thought of something else that could potentially explain how Moran's remarks make sense in a way: when villains (especially the cocky ones) receive their comeuppance in movies, it's not necessarily a bad thing to find it funny. For example, when Hans Gruber goes out the window in Die Hard? I found that amusing because he was, much like Scabior, an unbelievably cocky sonofabitch. It didn't mean that his moment with McClane before wasn't incredibly tense and well-acted - the scene gets me every time - but much like a lot of us were laughing when the centaurs carry Umbridge off, seeing Scabior get his ass handed to him by being outsmarted by one student is in and of itself a funny comeuppance, even if the battle compotent is largely serious.
Hope you like it!
That's shitty
Mysterious thing time.
Mysterious thing time.
Mysterious thing time.
Are you calling me physically thick?
Mysterious thing time.
it was a passing comment, not a statement.. stop making uncalculated assumptions?
LOL, I'm not thick. I'm good and average. Not too gangly, ugly, and skinny unlike others :-"
But this scene will be amazing, I'm sure of it.
Mysterious thing time.
Seriously, you sound like an ass whose belitting comments come off as borderline disrespectful. You state that, because you reacted to certain scenes in a particular way, Part 1 was "non-stop comedy".
EDIT:
All good points, Fury. Don't forget the numerous jokes at Gimli's expense that happened during the battle scenes (Aragorn tossing him, not being able to see past the wall at Helms Deep, etc). They weren't distracting from the overall expertise of the battle, and if everything's well-executed here, Scabior acting like...well, Scabior, Harry Potter's more morally wicked answer to Jack Sparrow, won't be indicative of how the battle as a whole is treated.
Even so, a lot of immature jerks are in theaters because they are accompanying a relative, significant other or friend (especially teenagers that seemingly find any emotional moment worthy of derision), so I'm not going to treat their reactions as absolute artistic consensus. One theater will react completely differently to what another theater reacts to based on what kind of people are there.
You're entitled to believe whatever you want about Part 1, but "let's face it" brings me into a side that I am not on.
Mysterious thing time.
Mysterious thing time.