Home General
Welcome to Harry Potter Forum! Below you will find many interesting threads and discussions. Enjoy.

A Rant About Filmmaking

NumberEightNumberEight Posts: 1,574 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited January 2012 in General
To all those people out there that claim art is very, very important, I want to tell you something: it's not. If you compare art to science, your opinion should never be taken seriously again. When you say shit like the following, I want to punch you and burn down every art school that swindles students out of money:
Imagine a doctor going into surgery with only a limited amount of knowledge - I wouldn't trust his or her output anymore than a filmmaker who doesn't even know the history of cinema. The more things you see, the more knowledge you have. THAT'S where you get original ideas and films.
And your point is? You mean one should be respected and the other not? One is a science that saves lives, the other is an art that touches peoples lives. Sorry that you feel cinema is such a lowly thing.
You all read those quotes correctly: the film medium is just as important as science and the brilliance of being a medical doctor. Art TOUCHES LIVES, while science SAVES THEM. Clearly the former is just as IMPORTANT as the latter.

Art is meaningful to culture, sure, but it's a DISTRACTION. Science is all about PROGRESS to help society last longer and to figure out the mysteries of our world and beyond. Science feeds curiosity. Those film study classes are not as important as that one math class, whether it's college algebra, pre-calculus, calculus, differential equations, discrete mathematics, linear algebra, statistics, etc. Those film studies classes are not as important as physics, chemistry, geologoy, etc.

Art is in no way comparable to science. Maybe if everyone comprehended this point, the market wouldn't be saturated with art majors, where they protest that they can't find a job using their expensive degrees.
Pottermore username: DustBlade76

So Crucify the ego, before it's far too late, to leave behind this place so negative and blind and cynical. And you will come to find that we are all one mind, capable of all that's imagined and all conceivable.
Post edited by NumberEight on
«134

Comments

  • Honestly? At least Art is acessible to anyone around the world and not limited to a wealthy few. You can't even compare those two segments. Art ia about cultural identity and it basically defines who you are, what tou think.
  • NumberEightNumberEight Posts: 1,574 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Not all of those going to school to be engineers, doctors, research scientists, etc, are wealthy. I can say the same about those art majors that go to private art schools like SCAD, where you come out owing tens of thousands of dollars in student loans, sometimes totaling over $100k.

    And no, art has no effect on how I think. I don't look to art to tell me how to think and I should be defined. I look at what I think is important to the world to help shape me. You know, subjects that explain the world, that explain why I'm here, empirically. A movie going on about the human condition isn't going to change my view on the matter, unlike say studying evolution and the behavior of humans since their inception.
    Pottermore username: DustBlade76

    So Crucify the ego, before it's far too late, to leave behind this place so negative and blind and cynical. And you will come to find that we are all one mind, capable of all that's imagined and all conceivable.
  • AbhishekAbhishek Posts: 4,233 ✭✭✭✭
    But Eight, there a a number of branches in science, say for example Civil and geological engineering that really blur the gap between Arts and Science. Or say things like Nanotechnology or material sciences- an example of which could be a beautiful looking high end Touchscreen phone that needs to look and appeal to the artistic senses / look beautiful while at the same time exhibiting the best that technology has to offer. Don't then these things go hand in hand, and compliment each other rather than competing against each other? I mean there are several technologies on display that make you wonder, Is this "more science than art" or vice versa...They can perfectly co-exist. Science needs Arts and Arts needs Science.
  • NumberEightNumberEight Posts: 1,574 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 2012
    There's more science in those high tech gadgets than art. They make them look aesthetically pleasing so they can make money. That in no way is equivalent to what was involved in making the device WORK, the programming, the circuitry, etc.

    When I go on these rants my friends ask me why I like watching movies. That's not an adequate argument, but it's simple: I like being entertained and I like discussing them. It's a hobby. But I will not pretend, while I sit in that theater watching Dragon Tattoo, that this product and what went into it is equivalent to a medical doctor, scientists who find cures to diseases, who explain our genesis, etc.
    Pottermore username: DustBlade76

    So Crucify the ego, before it's far too late, to leave behind this place so negative and blind and cynical. And you will come to find that we are all one mind, capable of all that's imagined and all conceivable.
  • NumberEightNumberEight Posts: 1,574 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 2012
    Keep in mind that I realize art's significance to culture.
    Pottermore username: DustBlade76

    So Crucify the ego, before it's far too late, to leave behind this place so negative and blind and cynical. And you will come to find that we are all one mind, capable of all that's imagined and all conceivable.
  • AbhishekAbhishek Posts: 4,233 ✭✭✭✭
    edited January 2012
    So do you disagree with the statement that there is no elegance and a sense of beauty inherent in Sciences? I ask because I have read this book and it takes the opposing viewpoint of what you are trying to say. If you haven't read it, you should definitely give it a try, because it strongly ties in with whatever this thread is about.

    http://www.amazon.com/Truth-Beauty-Aesthetics-Motivations-Science/dp/0226100871

    EDIT - I saw your latest post after I had written this.
  • NumberEightNumberEight Posts: 1,574 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 2012
    Beauty does not necessarily mean art, though. Science is beautiful in the sense that it explains our creation, it feeds and supplies nourishment to our curiosity to explain the unexplainable. It brings a flood of joy in knowing that there IS a reason why certian things happen. This feeling about science can be reflected in art, most recently in The Tree of Life and Contagion, but these products in and of themselves are in no way substitutes for the real thing. They are most certainly not as important and information-inducing as the various fields of science.

    I probably admire those two films more than anything I've seen in a long time because they are so pro-science.
    Pottermore username: DustBlade76

    So Crucify the ego, before it's far too late, to leave behind this place so negative and blind and cynical. And you will come to find that we are all one mind, capable of all that's imagined and all conceivable.
  • NumberEightNumberEight Posts: 1,574 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Look at this rant from a character in Battlestar Galactica to see how science is beauty:
    I DON'T WANT TO BE HUMAN! I want to see gamma rays! I want to hear X-rays, and I -- I want to -- I want to smell dark matter! Do you see the absurdity of what I am? I can't even express these things properly because I have to -- I have to conceptualize complex ideas in this stupid, limiting spoken language! But I know I want to reach out with something other than these prehensile paws, and feel the solar wind of a supernova flowing over me! I'm a machine, and I could know much more, I could experience so much more, BUT I'M TRAPPED IN THIS ABSURD BODY! AND WHY? Because my five creators thought that God wanted it that way!
    Pottermore username: DustBlade76

    So Crucify the ego, before it's far too late, to leave behind this place so negative and blind and cynical. And you will come to find that we are all one mind, capable of all that's imagined and all conceivable.
  • Darth LedgerDarth Ledger Posts: 6,594 ✭✭✭✭✭
    For the second time in my life... I understand #8's opinion. Although even you must admit carrying certain areas of science to the quantum level extends past trying to help people and becomes an obsession to explain the un-explainable... There are benefits, yes, but most people do not view art or astrophysics of any more importance than the other. Medical Science or Environmental Sciences and recently Atmospheric Sciences are significant players in keeping people alive however. To be honest I hope I spend the rest of my life trying to better understand the certain physical phenomena of our atmosphere that drives a strong tornado as opposed to a lighter one so we can enhance our prediction abilities. We can be better prepared against tragedies like last April if we knew for a fact the strength and general location a Tornado might occur more than days in advance.

    I love the arts, I adore Literature... But many Americans are falling behind in Math, I see it getting worse especially in my sisters classes because I tutor half of them. Some of them have calculators out for 3x4 or 12/3... :-B
    "If you make yourself more than just a man... If you devote yourself to an ideal... You become something else entirely- A Legend."

    image

  • RyGuyRyGuy Posts: 7,837 mod
    I'm sorry but I totally disagree with you on this. First and foremost it sounds like you are making one comparison between Science and Filmmaking of some sort. That is just one comparison of many. When somebody says art though, it has many branches in this day and age with Visual Art, Digital Design, Drama, Music, and Film. I'm just going to assume this since that is the term you used. Anyways Art is in now way shape or form useless. one thing you said stuck out to me:
    And no, art has no effect on how I think. I don't look to art to tell me how to think and I should be defined. I look at what I think is important to the world to help shape me. You know, subjects that explain the world, that explain why I'm here, empirically.
    Well that's the thing. Art can explain the world and it doesn't explain why you are here but it examines you evolution through early artifacts and cave paintings. Art History to me has been more beneficial to me than world history because in my world history classes we just learned a series of years, dates and major events. In Art History we examine images, why they were created, their use, their purpose, and how humans created their world visually. One period that fits into this category is Egypt - New Kingdom and Old. With the aide of Hieroglyphics, Artifacts inside tombs, sculpture and architecture; archeologists, paleontologists, art historians, etc have found, collected and analyzed these artifacts and have developed a consensus as to how these people lived, their customs, religions, system of power and so many more aspects that I do not care to ramble on about. They have developed a major understanding of how that time period was and that is incredibly beneficial to human knowledge. It is not just with Egypt but most ancient cultures...The Romans, The Greeks, The Minoans, and Early Europe. These cultures need to be studied in order to gain an insight into how we came to be and how it affects us now. Without science too we would not be able to study this. Scientists preserve the artifacts, clean them, date them, check them for anything new or what materials were used to make them. Art Historians catalog them, learn their purpose, examine the data, photograph them and sometimes share them with the world. This is needed for anyone to help gain a broader understanding of human life and how people have thought over time. It is one thing to find out lots and lots of information about how we came to be here, but seeing the entirety of logical human thinking portrayed by images of people of the past, rulers, ordinary ways of life, etc is a pretty great thing. Without Scientists and Artists working hand in hand these artifacts would be destroyed by Earth's natural aging process. Without Art history it would be impossible to learn about other cultures.

    The point I hear you making with Art "not being as important as Math, Physics, Chemistry, etc." Well logically yes those do stand a bit higher for one to study but it is hard for some individuals to gain an understanding of them. Art is incredibly important on the basis that is helps people communicate. Art is a tool for humans to use for the means of communication. Art reflects a society just like with ancient cultures. When we are long dead and people walk through museums and see things to define our periods in time, they will analyze these artifacts to gain an understanding of how we lived. All art today is not just something pretty, or something abstract. There are still traditional artists working and also the modernity of some work can issue an image of how shallow, narrow, and individualized our culture has become. Humans are animals plain and simple and Art can show how our species has come from point A to Point B. The areas of art are tools for individuals to use as a means to tell a story. The age old premise of telling a story is one that lives on in many. Film now is one area that uses Music, Drama, Dance (in some cases,) Cinematography, Design, Typography, Art Design, Production Design and that is just scratching the surface. All of those areas are compiled together in order to pull something together to do that age old human intrest to tell a story. Ancient cultures have done it to tell great stories of Gods, Mythical beings, great heroes in society and events in daily life and thinking about it, doesn't Art do that as well? Doesn't it explain this same idea but in another form? Art is a valuable way for humans to take their mind off the world around them if it is chaotic and explore the depths of their mind no matter which area they are working in. It has its place in society as does all the other areas of education. It is how some people choose to think that changes the world.

    If there is ever one thing about Art I have ever learned is that it is everywhere and it is definitely needed. For instance in front of me I have a lamp, a desk, phone, poster, pencils and with every single item here there has not been one way art has not defined them. Simple everyday items. Somebody had to design the lamp and use color mixing to find the right color for it. Someone had to design the desk and pick the color for it. Someone designed my phone and had graphic designers visually create each feature for the phone. Someone had to take the photo for the poster to even be possible, study typefaces and figure out which works best with the image an then get the right font size and kerning for it to look perfectly. Somebody had to pick out the color for the pencils and design the shape of them. I can easily look around my room and see how art has impacted every single thing. Art is incredibly useful to human beings because it helps us express ourselves. With color, shape, size, texture, etc it helps define our likes and dislikes. It could describe how we are feeling or just a general intrest in something. So to say that this area is useless is honestly pretty dishonest to yourself to think in that manner. Just look around at man made objects. I think you are looking at your argument at one side and not both sides of the coin. Every Pro creates a Con. Every Con creates a Pro.
    image
  • Darth LedgerDarth Ledger Posts: 6,594 ✭✭✭✭✭
    But I have an undeniable faith in God so I study science to understand how he works and to fully grasp the beautiful work he created... In a way it is like a big work of art from a philosophical angle.
    "If you make yourself more than just a man... If you devote yourself to an ideal... You become something else entirely- A Legend."

    image

  • @NumberEight, you are here, posting in this forum, because of art.
  • Darth LedgerDarth Ledger Posts: 6,594 ✭✭✭✭✭
    On a skill level I know I could never paint a picture like Thomas Kincaid... I could try my whole fucking life to learn but could never do it. But Calculus is no problem, Physics Sequence etc. bring it on... But I respect that which I could never do so my hat goes off to the military and any kind of performer or artist.

    For some people business and money are more important than Science or Art... They lord over their companies and make assloads of money and scoff at our conversation.
    "If you make yourself more than just a man... If you devote yourself to an ideal... You become something else entirely- A Legend."

    image

  • Darth LedgerDarth Ledger Posts: 6,594 ✭✭✭✭✭
    That being said Teachers are underpaid and under-educated.
    "If you make yourself more than just a man... If you devote yourself to an ideal... You become something else entirely- A Legend."

    image

  • NumberEightNumberEight Posts: 1,574 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Incorrect, @Henrick. I am here posting on this forum because of the advent of the internet and the hard work people put into it. Art had nothing to do with the creation of the internet. The creation of this forum's look? Absolutely. But that's second to the basic software that was design to allow HPF to exist.

    @RyGuy, when people think of art, they don't go into the outstanding detail (kudos!) you did mentioning cave drawings and the like. They think about movies, music, modern paintings, etc. My rant is specifically about filmmaking, sparked by an idiotic comment on the Blu-ray.com forums by someone whose brain function is on the same level as an embryo. I do feel the same about music and paintings, however. They are in no way comparable to any of the advances made by modern science.

    About the math scores: people in America are lazy and are distracted by the things they see on television and then have career ambitions because of it. Look at American Idol and the poor children that were subjected to Hollywood and wanting to be a part of its corrupting influence. Look at how ecstatic those singers are when they make it past the first round. They should instead be at home hitting the books, learning about things that will make us, as a society, prosper. We need to raise our math and science scores because they are pitiful and only reinforce the stereotype that Americans are dumb. America needs Tiger Moms.

    Art is a distraction from the most pertinent issues of our time.
    Pottermore username: DustBlade76

    So Crucify the ego, before it's far too late, to leave behind this place so negative and blind and cynical. And you will come to find that we are all one mind, capable of all that's imagined and all conceivable.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0
    edited January 2012
    Wrong. You are here because you've read Harry Potter. Reading is literature. Literature is written art. You are here because you identify with a cultural manifestation. And now tell me. How would this forum exist if Art was not important?

    Art and science always coexisted. Leonardo Da Vinci is the biggest example of it. Try researching about the Renaissance.
  • Martin1Martin1 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 2012
    Guys, Eight doesn't mean this on a deep level as he said. Of course I fully agree with him, science/math is more important than art at this level. Nevertheless, art is still extremely important.

    The word art can be taken at such a broad level. Literature to filmmaking, anything could seriously fall under the category of art. Art allows people to expand their minds. One who reads and understands complex literature is more likely smarter than one who doesn't. Now, I think I would stop at literature. I wouldn't be able to say an artist is or a filmmaker is, because they are simply experts in their field.

    But art leads to science. Look at some of the greatest artists of all times, I mean mainly da Vinci, and he was a scientists. His art lead to his science, there's No denying that. But here's where I agree with Eight: the scientific inventions of Da Vinci are more important than his art. His art will level forever, don't get me wrong, while his scientific inventions are extremely outdated now, but I see where Eight is coming from. This isn't at a deep, personal level, it's simply saying one is more important in a general sense.

    But even though I'm agreeing, we NEED art. We couldn't live without it, and as a society, we'd fall apart.
  • HessHess Posts: 1,734 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'm sorry but science has ruined this world in a lot of ways.
    image
  • NumberEightNumberEight Posts: 1,574 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 2012
    @Henrick

    So, if the internet didn't exist, I'd be here posting?

    Ps. My very first sentence in this thread says "very, very important." And it seems you aren't comprehending the argument that it is not as important as science, my entire thesis for this thread.
    Pottermore username: DustBlade76

    So Crucify the ego, before it's far too late, to leave behind this place so negative and blind and cynical. And you will come to find that we are all one mind, capable of all that's imagined and all conceivable.
  • Martin1Martin1 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭✭✭
    How has science ruined this world? Oh, by helping the sick recover? Transplanting organs? The entire medical field would be nothing without science, and that's only medical field. Our future with natural resources heading towards their finish is relied on who? Artists? No, science. Science will have to find a way to create renewable resources. If science has done any bad, art has done just as much.
  • NumberEightNumberEight Posts: 1,574 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 2012
    @Hess, would you mind elaborating? Does this ruination invalidate its massive achievements, like modern medicine and the invention of math, the latter of which paved the way to our innovations and our ability to prolong survival?

    I'd argue that art has ruined the world in a lot of ways. Look at the income gap in the United States and how popular filmmakers, musicians, and authors contribute to it. Look at how, because of art, stringent copyright laws exist to enrich them even further. Look at how they get paid more than once for a single job performed when other professions only pay you once. Every time an artist makes a film or a song, they are complicit in the actions the MPAA and RIAA perform to quell the onslaught of piracy. So, when people like Mark Ruffalo go on television and complain about proposed legislation like SOPA and PIPA, remember that they are feeding the desire for the passage of that legislation every time they participate in the creation of a film.

    @RowlingintheDeep gets what I'm saying.
    Post edited by NumberEight on
    Pottermore username: DustBlade76

    So Crucify the ego, before it's far too late, to leave behind this place so negative and blind and cynical. And you will come to find that we are all one mind, capable of all that's imagined and all conceivable.
  • RyGuyRyGuy Posts: 7,837 mod
    @NumberEight I couldn't agree more on math scores lol. I'm not sure what it is but my generation is almost lazy about it. I don't mind thy I've had to take math and science courses. I sucked up my pride learned the material and after facing the fits hurdle I got over it and began to learn and learned so much valuable information. Ive retained more from art classes but that's my area of concentration but in order for art students to have a future, they must first look to the past. Also in that context then I agree to what you said. I just had to see what you were meaning lol I had just woke up when I read this and replied. There's something amazing about standing in front of a large ancient painting in a museum and the feeling is unlike anything else on earth. Being in contact with another culture in the same room and that culture being from so long ago is an amazing feeling as a human being.
    image
  • HessHess Posts: 1,734 ✭✭✭✭✭
    image

    Look at the picture, we MUST develop both sides to be inteligent human beings. Now, has science been helpful through out history? Of course, extremely. But how do you feel when you realize that pretty much everything you eat is manufactured? Or the fact that the next big war could destroy this planet as we now it thanks to the nuclear power?

    Science is important, but it has the ability to both create and destroy. You can't say the same about films, books, music, etc.
    image
  • Martin1Martin1 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Eight gave an amazing point with SOPA/PIPA. Who is behind those bills? Music and movie companies. What is music and movie? Art.

    So yes, art can destroy as well. Art is propaganda, for that can be literature and drawing. I doubt any would say propaganda is good.

    Yes, science can destroy countries, but it's not science that causes it, it's greedy and pathetic leaders with no brains. There will never be nuclear war until a true bonehead rules a country with nuclear weapons. Why do you think the Cuban missile crisis was averted? Because both sides knew they would both be destroyed. The only war nuclear war will happen is if there is a ruler that gives zero shots about their country and wants it to become ash as long as they attack everyone. Every ruler wants their country to become the dominant one, and nuclear war would simply destroy everything. So I don't see that beingsized as anything more than a threat for the time being.
  • NumberEightNumberEight Posts: 1,574 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 2012
    @Hess: "Science is important, but it has the ability to both create and destroy. You can't say the same about films, books, music, etc. "

    Yes, I can say that, and I just did in an earlier post.

    Pottermore username: DustBlade76

    So Crucify the ego, before it's far too late, to leave behind this place so negative and blind and cynical. And you will come to find that we are all one mind, capable of all that's imagined and all conceivable.
  • Darth LedgerDarth Ledger Posts: 6,594 ✭✭✭✭✭
    How can you fit a 4 between a 5?


















    F(IV)E

    8-}
    "If you make yourself more than just a man... If you devote yourself to an ideal... You become something else entirely- A Legend."

    image

  • AbhishekAbhishek Posts: 4,233 ✭✭✭✭
    @Hess - Buddy I think you are confusing "creativity" and "imagination" with Arts when you talk about the right hand side of that image . Of course Arts does possess these, but these can solely be taken as being Scientific in their basis rather than attaching them with Arts.

    And you can't deny the negative influence of films, books etc or their ability to cause hatred, violence, belief in the absurd and so on and so forth. Maybe not music, but others definitely.
  • Martin1Martin1 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I fully agree that we need art. I mainly point to literature, because I know it has expanded my mind and my language, and after reading 1984 and Fahrenheit 451, I will never doubt the importance of literature or language.

    But what I'm saying is so general I could just say it like this:

    Doctor > Filmmaker

    There, that's it.
  • Martin1Martin1 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Why was John Lennon murdered? Oh right, crazy person with some art.

    Why might there be nuclear war? Oh right, crazy person with some advanced science.

    Same thing.
  • Martin1Martin1 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Albeit Nuclear war is somewhat maybe kinda A LITTLE more extreme than a single murder. Maybe. :p
  • NumberEightNumberEight Posts: 1,574 ✭✭✭✭✭
    @Abhi:

    Look no further than the different interpretations for Lars von Trier's Antichrist and Melancholia. Look no further than gangsta rap that glorifies violence and drug selling and consumption.
    Pottermore username: DustBlade76

    So Crucify the ego, before it's far too late, to leave behind this place so negative and blind and cynical. And you will come to find that we are all one mind, capable of all that's imagined and all conceivable.
  • Darth LedgerDarth Ledger Posts: 6,594 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 2012
    NumberEight tends to think very realistically and very concrete. He often can't relate to the abstract thinker.

    Edit: "If you don't know gangsta rap, don't go rappin about gangsta rap... Muhfuckas don't even know what tha fuck they talkin about.." - Ice Cube
    "If you make yourself more than just a man... If you devote yourself to an ideal... You become something else entirely- A Legend."

    image

  • HessHess Posts: 1,734 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 2012
    I guess it only depends on people then. You can have a great Doctor that can save lives, or a crazy son of a bitch that can kill you in the surgery because he doesn't care about people. Trust me, I have friends who study Medicine and some of their classmates are pretty insane. Like, they're only tinking about studying the whole day. And sure you find the same in the other field. Greedy bastards who only care about making money out of music and films, that's one of the reason why we have such shitty music and movies nowadays.

    And for the record, I studied Astronomy for 2 years, and did very well in sciences at scholl.

    We can all agree though that you can always find an inspiration in someone who wants to help the planet saving lifes, and someone giving a strong message in a good movie.
    image
  • Darth LedgerDarth Ledger Posts: 6,594 ✭✭✭✭✭
    In other news the first review of Chronicle was 5 Stars.
    "If you make yourself more than just a man... If you devote yourself to an ideal... You become something else entirely- A Legend."

    image

  • NumberEightNumberEight Posts: 1,574 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Please don't derail this thread, mate.
    Pottermore username: DustBlade76

    So Crucify the ego, before it's far too late, to leave behind this place so negative and blind and cynical. And you will come to find that we are all one mind, capable of all that's imagined and all conceivable.
  • Wolf_PotterWolf_Potter Posts: 3,644 ✭✭✭✭
    Well, I'm a Scientist, but I respect all people dedicated to Arts. Why? Because
    both are completely different concepts. So WE should
    respect both terms. I do respect them, because If I'd like to be respected, or to be
    taken serious, first I have to respect the other.

    And you can't compare Art & Science.
    It's like comparing Twilight & Harry Potter.
    Both are extremely different.
  • Martin1Martin1 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Earth - Art = Eh
  • Darth LedgerDarth Ledger Posts: 6,594 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The argument is over though, nothing else to be said. They both exist in our world and both are important in their own respects. In a general sense science and math are more important than arts. In the grand scheme of things they will both pass away.
    "If you make yourself more than just a man... If you devote yourself to an ideal... You become something else entirely- A Legend."

    image

  • Darth LedgerDarth Ledger Posts: 6,594 ✭✭✭✭✭
    But isn't a new smart phone the next frontier? Phones have become an integral part of our lives like we never could have imagined before the smart phone.
    "If you make yourself more than just a man... If you devote yourself to an ideal... You become something else entirely- A Legend."

    image

  • Darth LedgerDarth Ledger Posts: 6,594 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The next frontier to me is the Orion Space Craft. In 20 years we could have a base set up on the moon and from there we could eventually launch to Mars.
    "If you make yourself more than just a man... If you devote yourself to an ideal... You become something else entirely- A Legend."

    image

  • grable424grable424 Posts: 413 ✭✭✭✭
    edited January 2012
    A world without either would be complete shit... They are both 100% essential, and I don't think there's really any way that we can say one is more important than the other.
    image
  • Festax0333Festax0333 Posts: 11,753 ✭✭✭✭✭
    LOVE THE SIG GRABLE

    Smokey >:)
    imageimageimageimageimageimage
  • aaronaaron Posts: 20,950 mod
    Art is to the right side of the brain what science is to the left. They are both the same thing represented in different forms, both as equally as important as one enough, and both complement each other.
    imageimageimage
  • RyGuyRyGuy Posts: 7,837 mod
    Personally I don't feel that NASA is a big area to worry about right now. Leave it to future generations to go to mars and whatnot. The earth is not dying yet so we have no need to seek another planet to claim as a host...as far as we know lolol
    image
  • RyGuyRyGuy Posts: 7,837 mod
    And art is becoming more and more untraditional in the respect that most of it is becoming computer generated instead of done by hand. Is it a sign of the future? Is it just progression of a species? Or are we loosing our roots as a species? Science on the other hand is expanding thanks to technology while art is loosing its individualistic touch in a sense in my eyes. Anyone else have any thoughts on this?
    image
  • NumberEightNumberEight Posts: 1,574 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Even the film industry cannot escape the advancement of technology. Even film is being rooted out of cinematography in favor of digital, something I'm happy about.

    Pottermore username: DustBlade76

    So Crucify the ego, before it's far too late, to leave behind this place so negative and blind and cynical. And you will come to find that we are all one mind, capable of all that's imagined and all conceivable.
  • RyGuyRyGuy Posts: 7,837 mod
    I'm going to have to check that out man. On visual Art what are you thoughts? I am kind of curious to see how you and @SirCadogan think about this all with visual art going the direction that it is going. Do you think that Paintings and drawings will become obsolete in the future with advancements in computer painting programs. Do you think sculptures could become obsolete with advancements of programs to design vast creations such as ZBrush in which you then print to a modeling machine and it shoots out what you just created. Even Graphic Design which used to all be done mostly by hand is now entirely on the computer. Technology is reaching these forms more and more as time progresses and I can't help but feel in 50 years time or more humans wanting to pursue Art will see something like a paintbrush, a pencil or a block of clay and almost laugh. I worry that humans will loose their traditional methods in art down the road. I know its how everything is converting and how everything changing however the downsides to stuff like Digital painting are that it doesn't provide you with a texture, unique thick brushstrokes and you can adjust anything digitally unlike in a real painting where more skill is needed and pretty much anyone could do it. With sculpture I think physical activity will always be needed but less and less activity is being done by digital modelers. With Film, Digital is absolutely the only way to go these days. There's so many more options. With Drama there isn't really any huge advancements in that area just set design for staging and such. Maybe the addition of getting digital cameras to broadcast a performance all around the world. Music has definitely aided from technological advancements though. With the addition of such technology as Autotune now anyone can sing on tune but in person they can sound like a yeti screeching for their young. Technology is not bad but I do worry that some areas of art will get lost in the influx of the future but it is only natural in the human experience.
    image
Sign In or Register to comment.